[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[linux-security] Re: shadow-971001
- From: High Tide <hightide ginch org>
- To: M Taylor <mctaylor mta ca>
- Cc: linux-security redhat com
- Subject: [linux-security] Re: shadow-971001
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 23:51:57 -0500 (EST)
> Did you inform the shadow package maintainer?
no, not yet. I was actually hoping someone would just tell me I was
wrong, and I could rest easily.
> If you have the source, or even the docs this shouldn't be much of a
> problem an email address should be included, a simple CC would suffice.
I found another thing that I thought was a problem (I figured out it
wasn't before I sent the message, but I still sent it out about the
original issue), so I did dig up the email address located in the docs,
and it bounced.
<<< 550 <jfh tab com>... User unknown
there were also many reference in the source/docs to marekm. Anyone know
who this is? nevermind, I see it below.
> In fact, I think it was the maintainer of the shadow package who complained
> that vendors or users (don't remember) were producing their own patches,
> yet not informing him of the risk or the patch.
I agree, which is part of the reason I tried to make everyone aware how
stupid I am in not notifying the right people.
> Maintained-by: marekm piast t19 ds pwr wroc pl (Marek Michalkiewicz)
> Current version appears to be 980628 first off...
I'll check the latest version and mail marek if it's still present.
Thanks.
Sean
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]