[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[linux-security] Re: shadow-971001



> Did you inform the shadow package maintainer? 

no, not yet.  I was actually hoping someone would just tell me I was
wrong, and I could rest easily.

> If you have the source, or even the docs this shouldn't be much of a
> problem an email address should be included, a simple CC would suffice. 

I found another thing that I thought was a problem (I figured out it
wasn't before I sent the message, but I still sent it out about the
original issue), so I did dig up the email address located in the docs, 
and it bounced.
<<< 550 <jfh tab com>... User unknown

there were also many reference in the source/docs to marekm.  Anyone know
who this is?  nevermind, I see it below.

> In fact, I think it was the maintainer of the shadow package who complained
> that vendors or users (don't remember) were producing their own patches,
> yet not informing him of the risk or the patch.

I agree, which is part of the reason I tried to make everyone aware how
stupid I am in not notifying the right people.

> Maintained-by:  marekm piast t19 ds pwr wroc pl (Marek Michalkiewicz)
> Current version appears to be 980628 first off...

I'll check the latest version and mail marek if it's still present.

Thanks.

Sean



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]