[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[linux-security] Re: IMAPD fix for RH
- From: "Richard Stevenson" <richard al pmail gen nz>
- To: linux-security redhat com
- Subject: [linux-security] Re: IMAPD fix for RH
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:48:25 +1200
On 20 Jul 98, at 23:26, djb redhat com said this about [linux-security] Re: IMAPD fix for RH:
> > It appears that uninstalling the imap rpm uninstalls the pop mail service as
> > well, or at least disables it. Is this uncool? Is it safe to leave it
> > installed (but removed from inetd.conf) for the sake of keeping pop service in
> > place?
>
> I'm not sure, actually. The POP code comes from the imap package, so
> presumably you need to updated it *all* if you use any of it to make
> sure you are safe from attack.
The overflow in this case appears to be in an IMAP-specific
authentication mechanism, and so shouldn't affect the POP
daemons. I upgraded the lot anyway :-))
Cheers
Richard
--
Richard Stevenson
richard al pmail gen nz
PGP Key ID 0x0E5A2DD5
fingerprint = 7B DD 1C 51 76 05 A1 42 44 2E DD 61 78 DB 2D 07
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]