[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [linux-security] Re: Re: Bind Overrun Bug and Linux
- From: Leigh Porter <leigh wisper net>
- To: linux-security redhat com
- Subject: Re: [linux-security] Re: Re: Bind Overrun Bug and Linux
- Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 13:05:35 +0000
Duncan Simpson wrote:
> A recent CERT advisory said the sort of things we expect
>
> ps, pstree, netstat, ls, etc omit interesting information that you might not
> want to reveal.
> bind xterm backdoor.
>
> It has not happened to me so I do not know myself. Last time I recompiled
> everything from known clean source and it was *not fun*. I checked for hidden
> processes and stuff like that using echo * instead of ls (which is one of the
> most likely things to be trojanised).
I keep a secret store of such handy things as ls, ps etc on all my systems and
every
night I have a process check the md5sum of every config/binary/lib on the box
and report any problems to me.
No it's not fun :)
--
Leigh Porter
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]