[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Redhat Linux 6.0 Problem
- From: jlewis lewis org
- To: Gregory A Lundberg <lundberg vr net>
- Cc: Lisa L Berdeja <lberdeja 2xtreme net>, wu-ftpd wugate wustl edu, bugs redhat com, linux-security redhat com
- Subject: Re: Redhat Linux 6.0 Problem
- Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 12:01:50 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 7 May 1999 jlewis lewis org wrote:
> # ldd ./ls
> /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 => /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x40014000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001c000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
>
> I've never heard of libNoVersion. All the /home/ftp/bin stuff in 6.0 uses
> it...but it doesn't exist. Perhaps that's got something to do with
> it...but its odd that the programs work when I chroot there and run them.
>
> > Oh, and are you using symlinks? If so, there's your problem. Symlinks
>
> No symlinks except for zcat -> gzip. This is a standard Red Hat
> installation. It looks like they just screwed up the wu-ftpd package and
> will probably issue an update sometime soon. For me, this isn't a huge
> issue. I'm not using RH 6.0 on production servers yet. I like to wait a
> few weeks after new releases and see how much stuff they broke and then
> either wait for the updates or use the source.
I just noticed another really wierd thing. For some reason the anonftp
package on Red Hat (at least 5.2 and 6.0) that includes the libs and bins
needed for wu-ftpd to work for anonymous FTP includes what seems to be a
copy of /bin/ash as /home/ftp/bin/sh. Why the heck would they include a
bourne shell in the anon bin directory?
----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
Jon Lewis *jlewis lewis org*| Spammers will be winnuked or
System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
Atlantic Net | to get the job done.
_________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]