[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RHEL4
- From: Mark Dadgar <mark justracing com>
- To: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Discussion List <nahant-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RHEL4
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:04:01 -0800
On Mar 1, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Aviram Carmi wrote:
Got three questions related to upgrading/installing RHEL4:
Would you upgrade an existing RHEL3 to RHEL4 now? or wait a while for
it to stabilize?
I did it now and it's been flawless. It handles memory MUCH more
gracefully than RHEL3 does, too. No more pageing out active processes
because cache has sucked up half the available RAM.
If you had a brand new server, would you install RHEL3 and later
upgrade to RHEL4? or would you install RHEL4? now? wait a while?
RHEL4 would be my preferences, for the memory management reason listed
about.
However, if I had to match versions with existing servers, etc., I'd
wait. This is why the bulk of my production machines are still on
RHEL3.
I can wait since I really only need two linux boxes, and my old one,
a 933Mhz PIII which is running RH 7.3 is doing just fine, I got the
new server just because I got a great deal from Dell: dual capable
3.0Mhz Xeon with the 64bit EM64T 800fsb, two 1GB DDR2, and two 160GB
Serial ATA drives, for only $800, free shipping, I just could not
resist...
I'd put RHEL4 on that for sure.
- Mark
-----
408-399-3400 voice mark justracing com
408-399-3404 fax www.justracing.com
Check out my JustRacing Home Page at:
http://www.justracing.com/homepage/mdadgar
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]