[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RHEL4
- From: Jay Turner <jkt redhat com>
- To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Discussion List" <nahant-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RHEL4
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:05:05 +0100
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 04:40:22PM -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:17 -0800, Howard Owen wrote:
>
> > Also, you don't purchase RHEL3 or RHEL4, you purchase Red Hat Enterprise
> > Linux. You then load the version you want, inclusive from RHAS 2.1
> > through RHEL4. So if RHEL4 doesn't work for you, for whatever reason,
> > you can down level to any of the other two.
>
> Really? Can you point me to where that's documented? I absolutely
> don't doubt you, but I don't deal with licensing issues - the suits do
> that. I am just curious where that's written.
Two pages you can check out:
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/ (check under the Subscription Benefits
section)
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/compare/server/ (the line item for
"Product updates" . . . the same line item exists for the client solutions
as well)
In addition, if you log into RHN with an already subscribed machine, you
will see you have access to all three releases (2.1, 3 and 4.)
- jkt
--
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
Jay Turner, QA Technical Lead jkt redhat com Red Hat, Inc.
If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z,
X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. - Albert Einstein
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]