[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Tape access with mtx/mt/tar
- From: Christopher McCrory <chrismcc pricegrabber com>
- To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Discussion List" <nahant-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Tape access with mtx/mt/tar
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:06:22 -0800
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:38 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:14 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 05:06:06PM +0100, Rainer Traut wrote:
> >
> > > [root jupiter ~]# mt -f /dev/sg0 status
> > > /dev/sg0: Operation not permitted
> >
> > You should use /dev/st0 or /dev/nst0 for the mt command, just like
> > you have a single tape drive (unless this is changed in RHEL4).
> >
> > The /dev/sg0 device is only used for steering the autoloader.
>
> not even that, you can steer the autoloader via /dev/st* too afaik.
>
It depends on the auto loader. Some are more integrated than others.
It depends on the vendor. For the ones I have, /dev/{n,}stX only
controls the tape itself. /dev/sg$DependsOnScsiOrder controls the "Rube
Goldberg robot arm (*)". Some units need a 'mt offline' before the
mechanism can remove a tape from the drive.
(*) This is the technical term used by a friend of mine that writes
Novell Netware NLM and NT drivers for large cabinet size tape juke
boxes.
>
> --
> nahant-list mailing list
> nahant-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list
--
Christopher McCrory
"The^W One of the guys that keeps the servers running"
chrismcc pricegrabber com
http://www.pricegrabber.com
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]