[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: High swap utilization when running Oracle 9i
- From: mcclnx mcc <mcclnx yahoo com tw>
- To: Dirk Gfroerer guh-software de, "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 \(Nahant\) Discussion List" <nahant-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: High swap utilization when running Oracle 9i
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:55:03 +0800 (CST)
Can you say more detail where is "RHEL 4 and there's a
document (B13670-06) on the Oracle Technet". I can
NOT found it on OTN.
Thanks.
>
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/oracle9i.html
--- Dirk Gfroerer <Dirk Gfroerer guh-software de>
wrote:
> > I haven't done the Oracle 9i + RHEL4
> combination but I did notice a
> > reference to the following URL on the fedora-devel
> list today which
> > discusses installing Oracle 9i on Fedora Core 3.
> FC3 is fairly closely
> > related to RHEL4 so it may help.
> >
> > http://www.pagux.com/oracle9ionfedora3.html
> >
> > Naturally there are some package differences
> between RHEL4 and FC3
> > so I cannot be certain that everything referenced
> is available in RHEL4.
> > The document does references some of the kernel
> parameters needed but
> > does not include a reference to vm.pagecache.
> Stephen,
>
> thanks for helping out. Oracle has certified 9i on
> RHEL 4 and there's a
> document (B13670-06) on the Oracle Technet
>
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/oracle9i.html
> which
> describes quite well how to install 9i on RHEL 4
> (you need some
> additional patches and rpms from MetaLink). It
> worked flawlessly and the
> databases are back up running. I removed the
> compat-oracle-rhel4-1.0-3.rpm after the installation
> since I don't like
> my gcc being replaced by an Oracle shell script :o).
>
> The problem I'm facing now, is, that the machine was
> using hardly any
> swap with RHEL 3 (with vm.pagecache = 1 10 20).
> Currently the machine is
> using 600 MB of swap. From how the machine is
> responding, it seems like
> the Oracle buffers were paged out, which is ...
> suboptimal. vm.pagecache
> no longer exists on RHEL 4. I think for a 2.6 kernel
> I should be using
> vm.swapiness. However I'd like to hear from other
> people what they're
> doing, before playing around with kernel parameters.
>
> Thanks,
> Kind Regards,
> Dirk
>
> --
> nahant-list mailing list
> nahant-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/nahant-list
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]