[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Errata rpms only via up2date?
- From: Brian Long <brilong cisco com>
- To: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (Nahant) Discussion List" <nahant-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Errata rpms only via up2date?
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 09:05:15 -0400
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 06:50 -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 12:34:29PM +0200, Michael Stiller wrote:
> > Excellent work Brian. Just build the SRPM, updated and it works.
>
> Please note that building the SRPM yourself does *NOT* necessarily give
> you the same result as the Red Hat-supplied binary.
>
> There have been cases where Red Hat has even required an unreleased
> compiler to build a specific binary - I believe it was dhcpd recently
> where they discovered a compiler bug building it, fixed the compiler,
> and released the dhcpd binary. The fixed compiler wasn't released until
> later.
>
> If you want guaranteed Red Hat support, run the Red Hat binaries.
Sure. However, up2date is pure python, so it's interpreted at run-time
and I imagine that if Red Hat built up2date.i386 with one version of
python, your system's python runs it in practice. How's that different
from taking my SRPM, rebuilding and running up2date?
/Brian/
--
Brian Long | | |
IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||.
Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]