[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: ext3 sucks



Tom Sightler wrote:

     write   read
     -----   ----
ext2    81    180
ext3    34    222
XFS    109    213

This suggests to me you have a problem with the journal. Placing the journal on its own disk seems good to me.



I have a couple of questions, is access time important to you?  If not,
have you tried mounting with noatime?  Also, have you tried increasing
the size of the journal and the stride options (previous suggestion)?
My guess is that your having journal contention and having an external
journal might help.  Another option, you could attempt to tweak the
commit rate with the commit= mount option.  The default is 5 seconds
which seems too often for some disk arrays.

I'm completely unfamiliar with RAID devices and such, but it seems to me that the important point is the time before some Major Disaster (eg hardware failure the wrong side of the UPS) and the time it actually bites (eg the lights go out). That might be quite a long period (from the computer's perspective), and I'd not suggesting that whatever time that is it's the upper limit, not a good interval. Additionally, there may be some "lumpiness" in performance with longer intervals.

60 seconds seems to me a long interval, and if performance is still terrible I might test with longer intervals, but I'd not want to use them (or 60 seconds without some reassurance from someone who knows).



--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au  Z1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/

do not reply off-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]