[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: RHEL 4 improvement in use of swap? (compared to RHEL 3)



robert infotility com wrote:
Hi Ed, you wrote:


You really don't have enough memory.  I've got a RHEL 4 rebuild and was
forced to upgrade it from 256MB with only a single Java app that always
runs, a bunch of Firefox windows, and an occasional use of mutt and ssh.
I'm up to date except for the updates that just got released in the last
day or two.

Frankly, memory is cheap - far cheaper than RHEL is.  I added 512MB of
fairly high-end memory (PC 3200, 400Mhz DDR with ECC) for $80 shipped.
It's been a MAJOR improvement for me and I'm much, much happier.


Thanks for your quick reply. In part I'm looking for some
evidence that the same problem won't reappear when there is
more memory. Your observations post-512 M-upgrade are encouraging,
but even more encouraging would be something like "Swapping
was a problem because of factors X, Y, and Z in the kernel
but that's fixed now".

It could well be that there are no such assurances, but it's
worth asking.

256 is the minimum RAM supported. More is always better; I'd not consider less than 512 on _new_ hardware, whatever irs purpose.

I'm running FC3 on a Toshiba laptop in 256 Mb and it's painful. (My excuse for not adding more RAM is the cost for 512 Mb notebook sdram would go far to getting a new cheap Acer Aspire 3000 or the like, with 512 Mbytes, new disk, wireless, DVD burner etc),



--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au  Z1aaaaaaa computerdatasafe com au
Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/

do not reply off-list


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]