[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [OS:N:] Quick Survey
- From: Jonathan Moore <moorejon usd465 com>
- To: open-source-now-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [OS:N:] Quick Survey
- Date: Mon Sep 30 10:41:36 2002
Well put.
--
Jonathan Moore
Directory of Technology
Winfield Public Schools
Office 620.221.5100
Fax 620.221.0508
Quoting Edward Cheadle <echeadle yahoo com>:
> I don't find it hard to believe, but it is sad how
> intolerant people are--particularly people on this
> list The Redhat survey was clearly labeled as
> marketing information. It was not a subtle come on or
> an advertisement.
>
> Redhat (if some of you have forgotten) sponsored this
> mail list and is trying to promote Linux down many
> different avenues. Many of you have never purchased
> Redhat software. This is understandable--money in
> education is difficult to come by, but it also means
> that redhat has to conserve its money and still find
> ways to meet it's customers needs and pay for things
> like the computers and bandwidth that this mailing
> list consumes. It is not a monopoly so it can't simply
> raise prices to cover marketing costs and it is
> competing against on of strongest monopolies in the
> world. A simple survey on this mail list makes a lot
> of sense. They don't do it often and the information
> they collect helps to target thier marketing more
> directly.
>
> This a list of lots of smart people trying to do a
> hard job with very little resources. The people on
> this list of all lists should understand the value of
> information. Isn't collecting and disseminating
> information what education is all about?
>
> How can Redhat continue to grow and expand if it does
> not answer market needs? How can it find out what it
> needs if it has to spend money needlessly when a
> simple request can be made. If redhat does not make
> money someway, who will host lists like this one?
>
> I buy software from redhat when I could easily
> download it. I have high speed connections at home and
> work. This is because they do a great job and the
> money I spend with them is far less than with other
> software. Reality check time. I have six computers at
> home and in my wife's business.
>
> My Software costs for MS SW would be:
>
> 5 X $200 MS XP = $1,000
> 1 X $700 MS Server = $ 700
> 3 X $400 MS Office = $1,200
>
> Yearly maintenace is roughly 27% or $783 per year.
> For all of Redhat's software I pay either $39 or $199
> depending on the version I buy. Redhat gets 40 bucks
> to Redmonds 2900 + 783 per year. Do we think we can
> cut them some slack? Instead of bitching and moaning,
> how about some creative ideas on how Redhat can
> compete and serve the education market more effectivly
> instead of silly whining about some survey.
>
> Oh and no, I am not affiliated with Redhat in any way.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Subscription and Archive:
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
> -
> For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
> <https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
>
-------------------------------------------------
Visit Winfield Public Schools http://usd465.com
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]