[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [OS:N:] Exchange Server?
- From: Etienne Goyer <etienne goyer linuxquebec com>
- To: open-source-now-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [OS:N:] Exchange Server?
- Date: Sat Jan 10 10:26:01 2004
You are really facing two problems here :
- People want to use Outlook. Mostly because they know it, but also
because it is very featureful. I personnally think the interface is
a mess, but people get used to worst thing. If you want to use even a
small subset of the collaboration feature, you are stuck using
Exchange. So, if you want to make a case against against Exchange,
you have to make a case against Outlook. Though job ahead ...
- Alternative exist on the server side, but since there is no standard
for most of the collaboration features that Exchange/Outlook provide,
they don't interoperate out-of-box with most PIM and more importantly
with Outlook. There are hack out there to make it work such as Bynari
Outlook connectors, but they cost $$$ and don't necessarily work as
well as advertised. If you're going to pay, you may as well buy the
real thing.
The Outlook/Exchange couple is probably the worst example of vendor
lock-in in the current desktop computer landscape. On the other hand,
it's impossible to cover the same featureset with standard and published
protocol so people are forced to either drink the Kool-Aid or cut down
their expectations.
If that help you make a case, Exchange >= 2k require Active Directory to
run. You don't deploy AD in a week-end, and it does'nt manage itself
either. Installing Exchange may represent more work than they currently
envision. If you are to bring this issue to you school district
management, please don't take my words for cash and do some research to
understand the issue.
Considering the cost and manpower involved in deploying AD + Exchange,
you may convince the management to shelve the project. You may present
an alternative set of service based on IMAP, LDAP and some kind of Web
groupware. I am doing it right now. Keep in mind that this will
require manpower and know-how that your school district may or may not
have.
If they are not willing to revise their list of required features,
you'll be fighting a losing battle.
Good luck. I welcome your questions about the work I am doing right
now, if you have any.
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:30:34PM -0500, Patrick Cable II wrote:
> Hi list -
>
> My school district wants to set up exchange server... this scares me.
> Our current email system runs on qMail and such.
> What is there for alternatives?
> The superintendant is dead set on using outlook and sharing calendars.
> He will not have it any other way. Whatever he uses also must sync with
> his palm pilot
>
> Patrick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Subscription and Archive: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-source-now-list/
> -
> For K12OS technical help join K12OSN:
> <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/k12osn>
--
Etienne Goyer Linux Québec Technologies Inc.
http://www.LinuxQuebec.com etienne goyer linuxquebec com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]