[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: PAM_IGNORE (was Re: Why should setcred be called after session open?)
- From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas Williams ubsw com>
- To: Steve Langasek <vorlon netexpress net>,pam-krb5 lists netexpress net, pam-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: PAM_IGNORE (was Re: Why should setcred be called after session open?)
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 17:46:14 -0400
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:33:48PM -0400, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> I disagree. It's always appropriate to return PAM_IGNORE because it
> cannot contribute to success of the stack.
Let me correct this so it matches what I've been saying:
"It's never inappropriate for a module to return PAM_IGNORE if it cannot
perform the given function because doing so cannot contribute to success
of the PAM stack."
Cheers,
Nico
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]