[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: nptl 0.26
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper redhat com>
- To: phil-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: nptl 0.26
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:05:26 -0800
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> indeed, this is an important optimization if the lock-hold times are high.
> Waiting threads likely have higher priority and preempt the current
> thread.
But it cannot be generally done. For pthread_cond_signal and
pthread_cond_broadcast, for instance, the lock must be held until after
the notification. I was going to look at all these cases when the time
comes (i.e., I have some time). You beat me on this and I think rwlocks
are indeed fine. I've made some changes now and they'll be in the next
source drop.
--
--------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]