[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Current NTPL changes for PPC32/PPC64
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper redhat com>
- To: sjmunroe us ibm com
- Cc: phil-list redhat com, Paul Mackerras <paulus samba org>,bergner vnet ibm com
- Subject: Re: Current NTPL changes for PPC32/PPC64
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 12:46:35 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
0x004061e6Steven Munroe wrote:
> Here is the merged NTPL patch for PPC32/PPC64. The PPC64 NTPL code
> compiles but is not tested yet (still waiting for a PPC64 kernel with
> complete NPTL function).
Overall quite good but some bits need work:
- - follow the coding standard. See lowlevellock.c for one file where
the rules aren't followed. Function definitions don't have the type
on a line on its own, there are tons of places where the space
is missing before an opening parenthesis etc.
- - also in lowlevellock.c, look at the XXX comments. Simply define a
symbol in libc-lowlevellock.c and exclude the unnecessary definitions
when it is defined
- - the lowlevellock/mutex code seems not to contain anything machine
specific. Move it in the generic Linux directory.
- - same for semaphores if applicable.
- - the spinlock init/unlock code should move to sysdeps/pthread.
atomic.h contains macros for memory barriers
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+cj+r2ijCOnn/RHQRArG7AJ9TdxhZC8+rOVokM3s8B5KPTqddmACeLQOy
JsWEnVmRPK2ni8xT5k+ErvE=
=R7wn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]