[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH] Native POSIX Thread Library(NPTL) ARM Supporting Patches (1/3)
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux arm linux org uk>
- To: "Hu, Boris" <boris hu intel com>
- Cc: "Linux-Arm-Kernel (E-mail)" <linux-arm-kernel lists arm linux org uk>, "Libc-Alpha (E-mail)" <libc-alpha sources redhat com>, "NPTL list (E-mail)" <phil-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Native POSIX Thread Library(NPTL) ARM Supporting Patches (1/3)
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:21:00 +0100
People, please note that linux-arm-kernel is a member-only posting list.
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:23:02PM +0800, Hu, Boris wrote:
> diff -urN -X dontdiff arm-linux-2.5.59.orig/include/asm-arm/unistd.h arm-linux-2.5.59.boris/include/asm-arm/unistd.h
> --- arm-linux-2.5.59.orig/include/asm-arm/unistd.h 2003-05-22 09:59:15.000000000 +0800
> +++ arm-linux-2.5.59.boris/include/asm-arm/unistd.h 2003-05-22 16:55:02.000000000 +0800
> @@ -279,6 +279,12 @@
> #define __NR_epoll_ctl (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+251)
> #define __NR_epoll_wait (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+252)
> #define __NR_remap_file_pages (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+253)
> +
> +#define __NR_set_thread_area (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+254)
> +#define __NR_get_thread_area (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+255)
> +#define __NR_set_tid_address (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE+256)
> +
> +
> /* 254 for set_thread_area */
> /* 255 for get_thread_area */
> /* 256 for set_tid_address */
Only one minor point in this patch - since you're supplying syscalls 254,
255 and 256, could you remove these comments please?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]