[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Optimum partition sizes for RH 5.0 on 1.6G drive
- From: "Brian Koontz <briank crss gar esys com>" <briank crss gar esys com>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Optimum partition sizes for RH 5.0 on 1.6G drive
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:52:34 -0600 (CST)
On Dec 12, 9:42am, Patrick Hays wrote:
>
> swap 30 (I have 64 MB physical memory)
> / 100
> /usr 600
> /home 200 (backup regularly)
> /usr/local 200 (backup infrequently)
> /usr/src 100
> /var 70 (/tmp will be symbolically linked to here)
> /opt 300
I'm just curious about something. After all the tweaking you've done, I see
you've decided to go with a swap space less than 50% of your on-board RAM. Of
all the partition sizes, this one seems (to me) to be the most critical if, for
some reason, the partition fills up.
What led you to the decision to use 30MB of swap space on a 64MB machine?
There's different schools of thought on this, and just wanted to know what
school you're coming from.
--Brian
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]