[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Upgrade process generates signal 11 during Finding Packages
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting arl wustl edu>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Upgrade process generates signal 11 during Finding Packages
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 01:47:09 -0600
Kenneth Earl Harker (kharker cs utexas edu) said:
> Thus spoke Stephen P. Molnar:
> >
> > Unfortunately while the installer is finding packages to upgrade a problem
> > obviously arises because I get the following:
> >
> > install exited abnormally - received signal 11
> > sending termination signals ... done
> > sending kill signals ... done
> > unmounting file systems
> > /mnt/production
> > /mnt/rhimage
> > /mnt/proc
> > you may safely reboot your system
>
> I get the exact same thing, only on a never-before-used IDE hard disk
> while doing a new install. I've had this problem for a couple of weeks and
> I've been unable to resolve it. I'm afraid I have no idea what signal 11
> means...
Signal 11 means various things.
In the general sense, signal 11 is SIGSEGV, aka "Segmentation fault".
It generally means a program accessed memory that didn't belong to it, and
therefore implies that there's a bug in the program somewhere.
However, in some cases, it means something different.
For example, if when you compile large software (such as a kernel) you
get a message such as:
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
it could signify hardware problems, such as corrupted memory.
See http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ for more details.
In a really specific case, if you get this error when compiling on
a RedHat 5.0 system and you have a Cyrix processor, it's because the
new version of gcc exposes some problems with the cache on the Cyrix.
People have reported a workaround for this by installing a version
of gcc located at:
ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/GCC/gcc-2.7.2.3-glibc.bin.tar.gz
As to a signal 11 during the install, I'm not sure what the exact
problem could be - I've gotten the 5.0 installer to segfault,
but it was on a pretty specific case that wouldn't apply to
either of these two cases.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]