[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Will Windoze-95 install overwrite MBR?? (fwd)
- From: blah dircon co uk
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: Will Windoze-95 install overwrite MBR?? (fwd)
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 10:31:34 -0000 (GMT)
Hi,
Hmm, well reinstalling will write over the MBR without a doubt. I don't think
you can tell 95 not to, all Microsoft software assumes it is the only thing ont
he machine.
My solution would be to put LILO onto a boot disk. The reinstall 95 and THEN
after booting from the Linux LILO disk you could reinstall LILO back onto the
MBR...
Good luck,
Steve
On 06-Oct-97 micros50 wrote:
>
>from: T. Bird
>email: micros50 computer net
>
>My currentpartition table for the hard drive," /dev/hda" on my Linux box
>looks as follows:
>
>--------
>Disk /dev/hda: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 1023 cylinders
>Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes
>
> Device Boot Begin Start End Blocks Id System
>/dev/hda1 * 1 1 549 1106752+ 6 DOS 16-bit >=32M
>/dev/hda2 550 550 1023 955584 5 Extended
>/dev/hda5 550 550 560 22144+ 4 DOS 16-bit <32M
>/dev/hda6 561 561 576 32224+ 82 Linux swap
>/dev/hda7 577 577 592 32224+ 83 Linux native
>/dev/hda8 * 593 593 796 411232+ 83 Linux native
>/dev/hda9 797 797 847 102784+ 83 Linux native
>/dev/hda10 848 848 1000 308416+ 83 Linux native
>/dev/hda11 1001 1001 1023 46336+ 83 Linux native
>
>Disk /dev/hdc: 64 heads, 63 sectors, 1023 cylinders
>Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 bytes
>
> Device Boot Begin Start End Blocks Id System
>---------------------
>Up untill about an hour ago the first partition "/dev/hda1" contained windoze
>95. Just a short while ago, while logged in as root, I quite accidentally
>erased all the windoze95 files on that partition, all thats left on that
>partition are a few empty directories. (Don't even ask me how I did this).
>All other partitions were untouched and, the first partition "/dev/hda1"
>still exists as a valid DOS partition, it just no longer has any files on it.
>
>Now, here's what I've got to do. Since there are still a few windoze programs
>that a few people occsisionally still run around here, not me of course,
>I need to enable this machine the option to be booted in Windoze or Linux
>using LILO, as people were able to do before I wiped out all the Windoze
>files. Therefore I have to re-install Windoze in that partition "/dev/hda1".
>Being that /dev/hda1 was not backed up on tape or anything my only option
>is to re-install Windoze on /dev/hda1/ using the origional Windoze
>installation
>CD ROM, which I have here at my disposal.
>
>Now, here's my question. Reinstalling Windoze is easy of course, any idiot can
>do it. My main concern and question is, when I reinstall Windoze-95 on
>/dev/hda1/ is there a danger that it may overwrite the MBR (Master Boot
>Record)
>and thus I will have problems accessing Linux via the current LILO prompt
>at boot time? Does Windoze-95 have a tendency to do this or is it just a
>problem with OS/2 and Windoze-NT? Origionally Windoze 95 was installed on
>/dev/hda1/ and Linux was installed afterward and LILO configured during the
>installation process. Now by reinstalling Windoze 95 I am essentially doing
>opposite. Can I just go ahead and do this and expect no problems or is there
>anything I should watch out for?? Other than the possibility of the
>Windoze-95re-install process overwriting the MBR I can't think of any other
>possibilities.
>
>Any help, comments, etc. would be appreciated.
>
>/T. Bird
>/ micros50 computer net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
> To unsubscribe: mail redhat-install-list-request redhat com
> with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: blah dircon co uk
Date: 06-Oct-97
Time: 10:31:40
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]