[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")



Really Jim it depends on the applications your clients want to run.
if it just basic office stuff like word, excel, powerpoint, etc then your
best bet is to look at Star Office or Appix wares office package.
Star office is very much like office97 or 2000, plus it can read office
2000 docs.
If your client is a Multimedia based company that uses Flash, Director
then there would be no use.
The +ve to Linux is that laymen are too affraid to use it. so you don't
have people who don't know how to copy file from floppy to harddrive/floppy
using it. windows is a good example of "if you make it easy for idiots to use
someone will build a bigger and better idiot".
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Armstrong [mailto:jim_a technologist com]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 2:53
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")

Well, I just got back from posting a gripe to Suse... Bad as these problems are... Just try finding support info on their "hardware supported" database. 
It's performance AND search logic/engine are abysmal.
 
Of course, I'se looking for info on Compaq Deskpro xl (486) but I had very little problem finding the info on redhat.
 
I make my living from commercial networked application integration and, frankly, Linux still is commercially impractical on a typical user machine.
 
But I'm not giving up yet.
 
Jim A
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Newman pgen com <Paul Newman pgen com>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Date: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")



Problem is, Reh Hat gives no appearance of ever reading anything posted tro this
list...





jim_a technologist com on 01/02/2000 12:58:49

Please respond to redhat-install-list redhat com

To:   redhat-install-list redhat com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")




Well, finally a thread I can chime in on (given I'm a rank novice on Linux).
I believe that you'll find the typical notebook has more install problems than
the typical desktop as there are more proprietary or chassis vendor-specific
drivers to deal with.

I would like to say that it appears that, judging from alll the 6.0 - 6.1
issues, RedHat has inadvertently found their own sinkhole -ala- Win95.  Let's
hope the errata are resolved more quickly.
Attn: RH!   Keep on keepin' on.
Pettyfog
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Tassos <cybervet mail tvnet hu>
    To: redhat-install-list redhat com <redhat-install-list redhat com>
    Date: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 7:47 AM
    Subject: Screen cont.


    Plus one more thing I want to test RH in my notebook before I install to my
desktop
    Pentium III 600Mhz 128 Mb ,20Giga Hd,Pioneer DVD,3DFx voodoo 3500 w/t TV
tuner , a SB Live pro, Modem/fax/voice , scanner, CDR/RW , web cam, printer etc
etc.
    If i can't install it in my notebook (it should be easy ) how on earth i
will install it to the desktop with all this stuff it will take me years just to
go through all the how to's and the info pages for every component I have before
I'm able to take a simple      e-mail from linux.
    Regards Tassos

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]