[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")
- From: Kevin_Saenz dell com
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:51:53 -0600
We are getting off topic, M$ used html and vbscript in their office
packages isn't that what gets them in to the crap everytime someone
smart decides to create a harmful virial attack? Now your saying to
make packages us XML, it's great for DB interfaces on the web less
resource than ASP, do you really think that is a wise call?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Armstrong [mailto:jim_a technologist com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 9:26
> To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: Screen cont. (from the "Peanut Gallery")
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin_Saenz dell com <Kevin_Saenz dell com>
> "windows is a good example of "if you make it easy for idiots to use
> someone will build a bigger and better idiot"."
>
>
> I really beg to differ, Kevin, and it just so happens that
> phrase connotes,
> almost exactly, the attitude that Corporate IS managers (and
> particularly
> mainframe reports analysts, remember them?) displayed when the first
> Apple ][ with VisiCalc appeared on departmental managers' desks.
>
> I've found the end user is about as dumb, but not quite, as
> you expect him
> to be..for instance he KNOWS when he's being patronized.
>
> As far as the rest of it.. all a typical cubemonger really needs is a
> diskless network appliance with built in browser. Dont need Linux for
> that.. tho might as well use it as limited windows (CE). But
> just try to
> put one of those on the Manager's desk!
>
> And the user should only have to be trained on the app.. not
> the machine
> itself.
>
> Too many unix proponents confuse versatility and processing
> power with ease
> of use... I used to get into endless debates with developers
> who absolutely
> could not understand the business user interface and would
> proudly point to
> 7 or 8 open command line windows as proof of superiority of
> Unix... guess
> they figgered the sec'y would like to work on seven docs at
> once.. in "vi".
> And dont even get me started on the available commercially supported X
> interfaces.. they should just pack it in and go straight to XML.
>
>
> Jim Armstrong
> - been around the block- twice.
>
>
>
>
> --
> PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING
> LIST ARCHIVES!
> http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: mail
> redhat-install-list-request redhat com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]