[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Numbers from 'df' don't match
- From: Bob McClure Jr <robertmcclure earthlink net>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Numbers from 'df' don't match
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:52:39 -0500
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:25:10AM -0500, Jamin Collins wrote:
> Problem here is that it is not only doing this on the / (root) filesystem.
> If you look at the /boot you will notice that it is off by the same
> percentage. Additionally, while I can see the intention behind this it
> doesn't make much sense to me to have over 400 meg locked away on a 9 gig
> partition.
It is not "locked away". It is reserved for root processes. Trust
me, you don't want your root processes to run out of disk space. It
is not a pretty sight.
> I realize that many suggest using multiple different paritions
> for /, /usr, /home, etc... However, without a decent amount of experience
> this can lead to more wasted space. In short I'm a little dissapointed, I
> turned to linux for control over what was happening on my system. Now, I'm
> being told that Linux is taking away my control over something like
> this.
Linux is protecting itself from users. That makes it a more robust
system than, say, Windoze. I make that to be A Good Thing (tm).
> If I'm following this correctly, I can count on losing 5% of any drive I put
> linux on?
With all due respect, kwitcherbitchen. :-) No responsible SysAdmin
will allow any filesystem to get over 90% full. Disk space is cheap.
Cheers,
--
Bob McClure, Jr. | This is Linux country.
Bobcat Open Systems, Inc. | Email viruses? Hmm.
robertmcclure earthlink net | I've not had a problem with them.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]