[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: MS Exchange Client
- From: "Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK" <jfreivald att com>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 07:54:49 -0400
I didn't intend for this to become such a long thread, but it seems to be a
popular subject.
The end goal was to use Netscape under Linux, not WinDoze, and eliminate NT
from my laptop altogether.
I have tried ports 25, 110, and 443 without success. Looks like they have
disabled the standard protocols in favor of MAPI, so I will have to wait.
If anyone has any more suggestions, please send them to me directly so as
not to impact the list further.
Thanks again all.
JATF
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eudes Habambyingwe [SMTP:eudes lyxom com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 9:01 AM
> To: 'redhat-install-list redhat com'
> Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client
>
> Joseph,
>
> Your problem is that your linux stations can resolve the name
> "POLOCATION1" to an IP address. Windows workstation may be
> resolving it using the many mechanisms available other
> than regular DNS.
>
> Either add an entry in your DNS server files for "POLOCATION1".
> Or configure Netscape with the IP address itself instead of
> the FQDN name.
>
> To know what the IP address is, supposing you have access
> to an NT box, do:
> 1) Launch Outlook, and let it connect to the mail server.
> Then ... close Outlook!
> 2) On an Windows Command prompt, execute:
> nbtstat -c
> You will get a list of some Windows host on your
> network, including "POLOCATION1", along with their IPs.
> Doing so you have displayed the content of the netbios
> cache and the step 1) is only meant to ensure that the
> exchange server is in there; other operations like
> browsing that machine through Windows Explorer or
> Network Neighborhood would achieve the same.
>
> Hope this help. Otherwise whisper me offline; I can already hear
> the legimate complaints of these ladies/Gentlemen disgusted at
> all this windoze nonsense.
>
> Eudes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK [mailto:jfreivald att com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 11:25 AM
> > To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> > Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client
> >
> >
> > The only problem with this is that to set up Netscape, I have
> > to give the
> > computer DNS name (i.e.: "mail.host.com"), but in this case,
> > the name that I
> > type into the MS Control Panel applet is not a valid name (i.e.:
> > "POLOCATION1") - and I cannot "ping" that address.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > JATF
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Eudes Habambyingwe [SMTP:eudes lyxom com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 8:06 AM
> > > To: 'redhat-install-list redhat com'
> > > Subject: RE: MS Exchange Client
> > >
> > > I absolutely agree with Tom.
> > >
> > > Exchange Server fully supports pop3 and IMAP4 clients.
> > > Therefore on a Linux box you just configure Netscape
> > > for pop3 as usual and access your Exchange mailbox.
> > > Of course you lose those nifty collaboration and
> > > calendaring features mentioned by Tom. If you need
> > > them install an Outlook-like linux client such as the
> > > one pointed to by Jamin et al.
> > >
> > > For pop3, your exchange administrator will have to
> > > allow the pop3 protocol. This is a simple operation.
> > > To know if POP3 protocol is currently allowed, just
> > > telnet exchange_server_name 110
> > > If you get something like
> > > +OK Microsoft Exchange POP3 server version 5.5.2650.23 ready
> > > then you got it. Otherwise see your Sys Admin.
> > >
> > > Another caveat is that your NT password need
> > > to be currently valid. For example typically new
> > > users are added with expired password that they have
> > > to change when they log on to the network the first
> > > time. Those users will have to log on on a NT box first
> > > and have their password changed first. By the way this
> > > is also valid for Outlook Web Access with Netscape.
> > >
> > > Eudes
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tom Cooper [mailto:tom_cooper bigfoot com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:23 AM
> > > > To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> > > > Subject: Re: MS Exchange Client
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I use Linux in a corporate invironment, and Netscape to get to my
> > > > exchange server. IMAP is available to me, so I use that to
> > > > keep my mail
> > > > on the exchange server, while reading and composing mail using
> > > > linux/netscape.
> > > >
> > > > The biggest drawbacks are:
> > > > 1. No public address book availability. My company is in the
> > > > midst of a
> > > > directory deployment, and that problem should be resolved
> > once that is
> > > > in place.
> > > > 2. No calendaring support - Netscape doesn't know how to deal with
> > > > Exchange calendars
> > > > 3. Stability. For some reason, every few days my Netscape
> > > > will give me
> > > > the message "invalid something something in FETCH command"
> > > > and I need to
> > > > restart Netscape.
> > > > 4. I can't view "archives" because of the proprietary format that
> > > > Outlook uses.
> > > >
> > > > Another option is to use IMAP support from StarOffice. That
> > > > works, too.
> > > >
> > > > Finally, take a look at HelixGnome - they're working hard on
> > > > an Outlook
> > > > replacement. http://www.helixcode.com/apps/evolution.php3
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Tom Cooper
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK" wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there an e-mail client for Linux that will interface
> > > > with MS Exchange
> > > > > > using the MS Exchange native interface?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Our internal mail system does not use POP. I don't know
> > > > much about mail
> > > > > > protocols, but to set up e-mail under WinSlows I must use
> > > > Exchange or
> > > > > > Outlook and select the "MS Exchange Server" option in the
> > > > "Mail and Fax"
> > > > > > applet in the control panel. The address of the server
> > > > does not coincide
> > > > > > with any DNS or NETBios computer name, but instead looks
> > > > like some sort of
> > > > > > Post Office.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have no internal support for Linux, so if someone knows
> > > > what program to
> > > > > > use, then I will go to that list and documentation to
> > > > inquire on the
> > > > > > details.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Redhat-install-list mailing list
> > > > > Redhat-install-list redhat com
> > > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Standard disclaimer applies:
> > > > This message represents the opinions of the
> > > > author, and not necessarily those of any
> > > > organization to which he may be related.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Redhat-install-list mailing list
> > > > Redhat-install-list redhat com
> > > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-install-list mailing list
> > > Redhat-install-list redhat com
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-install-list mailing list
> > Redhat-install-list redhat com
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> Redhat-install-list redhat com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]