Re: Kernel too large

[Uncle Meat <kcsmart worldinter net>]

On Sun, 03 Sep 2000, you opined:
>When I try to compile my kernel, I get an error message stating that it is
>too large. I thought it would be small, since I picked only minimal options
>including support for a Travan floppy tape drive and TCP/IP networking. After
>getting the error message, I ran make bzImage and it worked, but is this method
>undesirable? Are there disadvantages to using bzImage instead of zImage?

That's why bzImage was invented and is fine. No advantage (other than
size), no disadvantage.

 -- 
It is easier to fix Unix than to live with windows.