[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Using DSL connection.
- From: chioufd sas upenn edu (Fu-Dong Chiou)
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Using DSL connection.
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 23:34:01 -0500 (EST)
Thanks for the message. I did download RPPPPoE and installed it, and I am now
connected. One question remains though, that is, although I can use telnet and
netscape, ftp and ssh do not seem to be working at all. Where should I look for the
cause of the problem? Thanks!
Chip
Matt Drew wrote: >
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Fu-Dong Chiou wrote:
>
> >
> > karlp ourldsfamily com wrote:
> > >
> > > I have 8 computers connected through DSL: 3 Linux, 5 Win98. I have the Cisco
> > > 675 external and do NAT and have only one IP address and use 10.0.0.N for
> > > the PCs inside the network. I also setup IP blocking stuff on the Linux box
> > > that NAT points to for HTTP and SMTP.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I only have a low end 3Com office connect ethernet hub, not a
> > router.
>
> Not necessarily a problem, depending on your ISP.
>
> > The modem is an external Westell DSL modem. I am not sure if this
> > modem is capable of DHCP. If so, how would I go about to activate it?
> > The NIC is recognized during installation, and I enabled dhcp
> > awareness in linuxconf, but nothing happened yet.
>
> Hmmmm. PPPoE?
>
> > > I was wondering if it is possible to use Verizon DSL modem from Linux. I
> > > have this modem connected to a 3Com ethernet hub, which connects to 3
> > > machines. Verizon DSL has software for PC and Mac, and both work. Each
>
> becoming more likely that their system uses PPP over Ethernet, or PPPoE.
> PPPoE requires a software driver. What is the name of the driver it
> uses, and does anything show up in Dial Up Networking when you install
> that software? I know that Mindspring used PPPoE before the merger, and
> wouldn't put it past them.
>
> > > machine would get its own IP address. Not sure if this should be the
> > > case, or Verizon just doesn't block a second (and beyond) machine to get
> > > connected at the same time and get an additional IP address. In any
>
> They might not mind, but they may charge you for it -- watch out for that.
> In general, NAT is a better but slightly more complicated solution, either
> using a hardware router (the 675) that can do it, a *nix machine
> running ipmasq/ipchains/ipfilter/whatever, or a Windows machine either
> doing its version of routing/NAT (win2k) or ICS (Win9x) which would be
> the least elegant and useful solution.
>
> > > case, there is no software provided for Linux. I tried to set
> > > up the network configuration the way I did on the PC, but obviously it
> > > didn't work out. I was wondering if there is a way to use the DSL
>
> I'm thinking definitely PPPoE at this point. Let's make sure this what
> we are looking at:
>
> phone line --> modem --> ethernet --> eth0 (accepting DHCP)
>
> Make sure that your ethernet is working properly, and that the module is
> loading without any issues. Double-check your ability to ping yourself
> (both 127.0.0.1 and a hard-configured IP address). If you have another
> machine, hard-assign that one an IP address on the same subnet as your
> Linux PC, and make sure you can ping the Linux PC from that other machine.
> Since it was working before, any phone line termination is probably
> correct.
>
> Then investigate the rp-pppoe package included in RH 7 (or get the latest
> from Roaring Penguin if you are on something else). You'll hate using it,
> but it isn't that hard. You can start with "man pppoe" once installed,
> and go from there to the documentation provided (rpm -ql rp-pppoe for a
> list of where the docs are, or just hit the website). I can't give you
> any more advice than this, because I've never set up PPPoE, preferring a
> provider who just does TCP/IP and ethernet.
>
> > > connection, or I am stuck with a modem? Thanks!
>
> You shouldn't be. Worst case, get another provider that doesn't use
> PPPoE, and provides some support for *nix machines. Telocity (my ISP) is
> nothing more than okay, I've heard that Speakeasy is better. You might
> also want to investigate more serious options from local providers - YMMV.
>
>
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt Drew
> Executive Officer
> Red Hat Consumer Services
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-install-list mailing list
> Redhat-install-list redhat com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
>
Best wishes,
Chip
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]