[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Kernel upgrade
- From: Stefan Wold <s wold wineasy se>
- To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Kernel upgrade
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:46:51 +0200 (CEST)
Hi.
Nothing would stop you from doing that. It will work perfectly. I think
many people, that concerns about security, does it this way since having a
compiler on a server might be a stupid idea. So what they do then is to
compile the kernel and the modules on another machine. And in your case
it's even more simple since the machines are identical. So go ahead.
Sincerely
Stefan Wold Vxl: +46 8 56311000 Wineasy AB
Staff, Sysadmin UNIX Fax: +46 8 56311010 AGA / Dalénum, Hus 113, 3TR
Mob: +46 701 880093 181 70 Lindingö
Tel: +46 8 56311093 Sweden
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 WStorey powerlan com au wrote:
> Don't know if I should ask this here or not but here goes.
>
> If I have two identical machines (A and B) and compile the kernel on one
> machine. What would be stopping me from just copying the kernel compiled
> for machine A onto Machine B and using that kernel to boot with.
>
> Assume none of the kernel components were compiled as modules even
> though the kernel has module support.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne Storey, MCP+I, MCSE
> Systems Integration
>
> Powerlan Ltd
> 2 Sirius Road
> LANE COVE NSW 2066
>
> Email: wstorey powerlan com au
> Web: http://www.powerlan.com.au <http://www.powerlan.com.au>
> Phone: +61 2 9418 3600
> Fax: +61 2 9418 3601
> Mobile: 0402 892 207
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]