Re: MEMORY EATER

["A. John Peters" <ajpeters ajpconsult com>]

Thanks, that was probably it, because my logrotate was huge.

John

On 12/2/02 1:49 AM, "Lawrence Kirby" <lawrence netactive co uk> wrote:

> I have encountered a problem with an older version of Redhat where logrotate
> would act like this if you let the /var/lib/logrotate.status file get too
> large. It managed other programs' log files fine but not its own! Trimming
> the file down to about the last week's worth of entries fixed it for me.
> logrotate may well have been fixed by now but it is worth checking.
> 
> Lawrence
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: redhat-install-list-admin redhat com
> [mailto:redhat-install-list-admin redhat com]On Behalf Of A. John Peters
> Sent: 02 December 2002 03:12
> To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: MEMORY EATER
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Why would logrotate constantly use 22-28% 0f the CPU 30% of my memory?
> 
> 
> 
>