[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Origin of UNIX
- From: "A. John Peters" <ajpeters ajpconsult com>
- To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Origin of UNIX
- Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 10:47:59 -0500
Sorry, I didn't read your response carefully. I thought YACC (Yet Another
Compiler Compiler) started that stuff.
By the way, emacs originaly started on multics, also virtual memory and ring
structure. All in all a good research project.
On 10/6/02 9:24 PM, "David Kramer" <david thekramers net> wrote:
> On Sunday 06 October 2002 01:34 pm, A. John Peters wrote:
>> On 10/6/02 10:05 AM, "Mark Knecht" <markknecht attbi com> wrote:
>>> http://www.unixhub.com/oldunix/unixname
>>>
>>> Google is your friend
>>
>> MIT had a research project in 1968 called Multics. It stands for Multiplex
>> something or other. Bell labs broke off and started Unix is Uni something
>> or other. or other.>
>
> Unix Is Not multiX
>
> Yes, it doesn't really fit, but it started a long tradition of
> self-referential acronyms.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> DDDD David Kramer david thekramers net http://thekramers.net
> DK KD "Light is meaningful only in relation to darkness, and truth
> DKK D presupposes error. It is these mingled opposites which people our
> DK KD life, which make it pungent, intoxicating. We only exist in terms
> DDDD of this conflict, in the zone where black and white clash."
> - Louis Aragon (1897-1982)
>
>
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]