[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: not vpn just a remote desktop client VPN
- From: Rob Crittenden <rcrit greyoak com>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: not vpn just a remote desktop client VPN
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:44:14 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Guy Rouillier wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > A VPN is HOW we get
> > through the firewall legally via port 22.
> >
>
> Not exactly. 22 is the default port for ssh. ssh, as used in this
> thread, can be thought of as encrypted telnet, though ssh can do much
> more. ssh != vpn. Once you have a VPN established, you can use an ssh
> application to open up a terminal session to a system at work, just like
> you do when you are at work (assuming you use terminal sessions at work,
> if not, sorry for the added confusion). VPNs will use some negotiated
> port, e.g., 1582, as the secure communications channel between your home
> system and your work VPN server, but it will never use one of the
> well-known ports (like 22 for ssh or 21 for ftp).
I should point out that you can run ppp over ssh and get a VPN that way.
You can also do local port-forwarding which is sort of a poor-man's VPN.
For just reading remote e-mail most people could get away with just
forwarding ports 110 (or 143 for imap) and 25.
rob
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]