[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: still -- building kernel rpm problem
- From: "Rokicki, Andrew" <ARokicki US TIAuto com>
- To: "'redhat-install-list redhat com'" <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: still -- building kernel rpm problem
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:42:37 -0500
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Campbell [SMTP:campbell accelinc com]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:07 PM
> To: redhat-install-list redhat com; redhat-list redhat com
> Subject: still -- building kernel rpm problem
>
>
> I didn't hear any response, so I re-downloaded the
> kernel-2.4.20-24.9.src.rpm
> and tried again. I still see the same thing during build. (See prior note
>
> below).
>
> I'm loathe to reboot w/ the new kernel to try it, because the machine is
> 50 miles away from me, and I can't get there easily to access the console
> to force a boot of the prior kernel.
>
> Is there a way around this issue for remote machines?
>
> thanks,
> -chuck
>
> Chuck previously wrote:
>
> > I downloaded the recently released kernel-2.4.20-24.9.src.rpm and did an
> > install as root. rpm -Uvh kernel-2.4.20-24.9.src.rpm
> >
> > Next I went to the /usr/src/redhat/SPECS directory and did this:
> >
> > rpmbuild -ba --clean --target i686 kernel-2.4.spec
> >
> > during this build I have seen amny occurrences of the following message:
> >
> > 1 of 13 checksums did not match
> >
> > What implications does this have for this build, and what should I do
> about it?
> >
> >
> > I wanted to build this specifically for the i686 platform, instead of
> > installing i386 binaries. This is (ostensibly) for performance reasons.
> Is my
> > reasoning all wet?
> >
> > thanks,
> > -chuck
> >
> --
> ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics | 1(713)993-0671
> ph.
> 2401 Fountain View | and Integrated Interpretation | 1(713)993-0608
> fax
> Suite 320 | |
> Houston, TX, 77057 | Chuck Campbell |
> campbell accelinc com
> | President & Senior Geoscientist |
>
> "Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!"
>
Sounds like you are not getting any responses.
I am no expert on this but -U option upgrades existing package. I is
possible that there is nothing to upgrade.
Try -i option
Red Hat has a how to do this. I did this 168 days age, I know
because my server is still running.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]