Re: [rhil] boot loader

["Vir Calimlim" <virbcal hotmail com>]

perfect Rick! further on ...

the boot menu shows the following options:
- RHL 2.4.20-8BOOT
- RHL 2.4.20-24.9
- RHL 2.4.20-8

do they represent minimum-maximum-middle startup configuration respectively?
in what occasions/conditions is it recommended to start one and not the
other?

its the first time i got to see this menu. am i right to presume that RHL
2.4.20-24.9 is supposed to be the only option that should appear there and
that the other 2 were only added after i played around with install-upgrade?

many thanks ... vir

--- From: "Rick Stevens" <rstevens vitalstream com>
Uh, I think you mean /dev/hda and /dev/hdb, right?  If you want grub to
install in the MBR of the first drive, first make sure that your
/boot/grub/grub.conf file is set up correctly, then:

grub-install /dev/hda

--- Vir Calimlim wrote:
hello gurus! i've got M$ in /deva and RHL9 in /devb. when i first installed
RHL9, i installed GRUB in the 1st sector of the boot partition which i
presume is in /deva. the boot loader isn't working so i'm planning to move
it to the MBR. how can i do this without having to reinstall RHL9? i've
tried RHL9 upgrade but the boot loader step is not performed giving the
reason of something about the kernel not being included in the upgrade.