[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: [Redhat] Server query
- From: "B, Prasada Rao (Cognizant)" <BPrasada chn cognizant com>
- To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: [Redhat] Server query
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:08:08 +0530
Hi Rick, Waldher, Travis, Michael and Mike,
Thank you verymuch for your useful answers. You guys made me clear understanding on Server and Desktop. Thanks a lot.
-Prasad Rao.
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-install-list-request redhat com
[mailto:redhat-install-list-request redhat com]
Sent: 20 December 2003 22:30
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Redhat-install-list digest, Vol 1 #4289 - 13 msgs
Send Redhat-install-list mailing list submissions to
redhat-install-list redhat com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
redhat-install-list-request redhat com
You can reach the person managing the list at
redhat-install-list-admin redhat com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Redhat-install-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: [Redhat] Server query (Rick Stevens)
2. RE: [Redhat] Server query (Waldher, Travis R)
3. RE: [Redhat] Server query (follow up) (Waldher, Travis R)
4. RE: [Redhat] Server query (michael Alexander)
5. Re: sendmail and blocked dynamic IP addresses (Rick Stevens)
6. Re: Printer maintenance (Rick Stevens)
7. new installation with IDE and SATA Raid (Justin Davis)
8. Re: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid (Mark Knecht)
9. RE: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid (Justin Davis)
10. RE: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid (Mark Knecht)
11. Canon i560 printer driver ? (Frederic Durodie on GeminiX)
12. Re: sendmail and blocked dynamic IP addresses (Chris Hewitt)
13. Re: re-directing root's email ? (M.Hockings)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 12:54:27 -0800
From: Rick Stevens <rstevens vitalstream com>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: [Redhat] Server query
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
B, Prasada Rao (Cognizant) wrote:
> Hi Rick,
> Thank you verymuch for your support Rick.
> I have one doubt from many days.What is Server actually? Coz Here I am sending my views on Server.
> If suppose we have 10 machine and all of them connected in LAN and all machine are cotacting the external world(say Internet)
> or communicating with other machine with in the internal network through a machine (gateway). That gateway machine is called Server Correct me If I am wrong.
> But in advertisements, companies like IBM, HP are specifying that IBM Server, IBM Desktop PC. From the advertisements I have identified the difference between them is only Configuration (Normal PC will have 128MB RAM and Server machine will have 512MB RAM). Nothing much I have Identified. Also they are saying Servers will have RAID support. cant we do RAID (Software) in Normal machines? What is the difference between the Desktop PC and Server machine?
> Because as I stated inmy previous mails, I am going to configure mail,DNS, webservers in my machines. Do I need to buy the Server machine only or Can I configure all of them in normal machine (If I have good configuration like 512MB RAM, 80GB HDD, ..etc). Please let me know in detail about Server and normal PC.
The terms "server", "desktop", and "workstation" have been very muddied
over the years.
In the old days, a "server" was typically a system locked up in a dark
room somewhere. It didn't have GUI. It often didn't have a video card
at all and depended on remote logins or a serial terminal to set it up.
These were called "headless" servers, denoting no user GUI. They were
usually much more powerful systems than those found on desktops, and had
their disks, network interfaces, filesystems, and kernel parameters all
tweaked to provide services.
"desktop" and "workstation" generally mean the same thing--a system that
a user would have on their desktop. They usually have a GUI (keyboard,
mouse, graphic display).
As far as "server" or "workstation" software, they typically differ only
in what packages are installed. Generally, development code (the
"-devel" RPMs) aren't installed on servers, as they simply run code
developed elsewhere. However, if you take, say RedHat Linux 9 and
install EVERYTHING, your machine can be either a server or a
workstation. If you select "server" installation, the development stuff
(C compiler, et al) won't be installed, nor will the GUI (X Windows)
be installed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens vitalstream com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- Memory is the second thing to go, but I can't remember the first! -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--__--__--
Message: 2
Subject: RE: [Redhat] Server query
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:09:46 -0800
From: "Waldher, Travis R" <Travis R Waldher boeing com>
To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Cc: "Rick Stevens" <rstevens vitalstream com>
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: B, Prasada Rao (Cognizant) [mailto:BPrasada chn cognizant com]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:54 AM
> To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> Cc: Rick Stevens
> Subject: [Redhat] Server query
>
>
> Hi Rick,
> Thank you verymuch for your support Rick.
> I have one doubt from many days.What is Server actually? Coz
> Here I am sending my views on Server. If suppose we have 10
> machine and all of them connected in LAN and all machine are
> cotacting the external world(say Internet)
> or communicating with other machine with in the internal
> network through a machine (gateway). That gateway machine is
> called Server Correct me If I am wrong.
> But in advertisements, companies like IBM, HP are
> specifying that IBM Server, IBM Desktop PC. From the
> advertisements I have identified the difference between them
> is only Configuration (Normal PC will have 128MB RAM and
> Server machine will have 512MB RAM). Nothing much I have
> Identified. Also they are saying Servers will have RAID
> support. cant we do RAID (Software) in Normal machines? What
> is the difference between the Desktop PC and Server machine?
> Because as I stated inmy previous mails, I am going to
> configure mail,DNS, webservers in my machines. Do I need to
> buy the Server machine only or Can I configure all of them in
> normal machine (If I have good configuration like 512MB RAM,
> 80GB HDD, ..etc). Please let me know in detail about Server
> and normal PC.
>
>
> Thanks and rgds,
> Prasad Rao.
>
>From a corporate perspective, here is what they mean: (with no
particular OS in mind)
Desktop - typically a middle-low end device that can do basic office
functions. Word editor, email, spreadsheets, etc. Hardware is
typically whatever the price break is at CPU wise, IDE hard disk,
128-512MB RAM, ok video card.
Workstation - typically a high end version of a desktop to handle more
engineering style applications. Such as NASTRAN, PATRAN, AutoCAD (for
bigger projects), Microstation, other software tools for finite element
analysis, programmers to aide in compiling times mostly, other types of
software development, etc. You will typically find 2 CPU's inside, both
higher end CPU (Pentium 4 Xeon for example), 64bit CPU's in some cases,
512-4GB RAM, sometimes very high end video cards (high end = $1000+),
Ultra 160 or 320 hard disks, sometimes in a RAID 0 configurtion.
Server - the type of machine that is normally locked behind doors. May
or may not have a video interface, if it does it's basic. Uses anywhere
between ~256-64+GB RAM, up to terabytes of disk space, multiple ethernet
interfaces, power/hard disk/memory/etc hardware redundancy, hardware
RAID, etc.
That is typically how I differentiate between the machine types at work.
When it comes to home use, small offices, etc. Rarely does a true
"server class" machine get used. In fact, I don't use them myself, too
cost prohibitive for what I need a machine to do at home or for some
side work.
--__--__--
Message: 3
Subject: RE: [Redhat] Server query (follow up)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:12:04 -0800
From: "Waldher, Travis R" <Travis R Waldher boeing com>
To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Cc: "Rick Stevens" <rstevens vitalstream com>
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: B, Prasada Rao (Cognizant) [mailto:BPrasada chn cognizant com]
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:54 AM
> To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> Cc: Rick Stevens
> Subject: [Redhat] Server query
>
>
> Hi Rick,
> Thank you verymuch for your support Rick.
> I have one doubt from many days.What is Server actually? Coz
> Here I am sending my views on Server. If suppose we have 10
> machine and all of them connected in LAN and all machine are
> cotacting the external world(say Internet)
> or communicating with other machine with in the internal
> network through a machine (gateway). That gateway machine is
> called Server Correct me If I am wrong.
> But in advertisements, companies like IBM, HP are
> specifying that IBM Server, IBM Desktop PC. From the
> advertisements I have identified the difference between them
> is only Configuration (Normal PC will have 128MB RAM and
> Server machine will have 512MB RAM). Nothing much I have
> Identified. Also they are saying Servers will have RAID
> support. cant we do RAID (Software) in Normal machines? What
> is the difference between the Desktop PC and Server machine?
> Because as I stated inmy previous mails, I am going to
> configure mail,DNS, webservers in my machines. Do I need to
> buy the Server machine only or Can I configure all of them in
> normal machine (If I have good configuration like 512MB RAM,
> 80GB HDD, ..etc). Please let me know in detail about Server
> and normal PC.
>
>
> Thanks and rgds,
> Prasad Rao.
>
For your needs... It highly depends on what you want them to do, how
much work you think they'll see and how reliable (hardware wise anyway)
you want them to be. I would say, in general, a beefed up desktop, or
maybe a low end workstation may be more than adequate for the average
users server needs. But even that is a loaded statement.
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: "michael Alexander" <linux milwaukeevalve com>
To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Subject: RE: [Redhat] Server query
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:19:18 -0600
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> Thank you verymuch for your support Rick.
> I have one doubt from many days.What is Server actually? Coz
> Here I am sending my views on Server.
> If suppose we have 10 machine and all of them connected in
> LAN and all machine are cotacting the external world(say Internet)
> or communicating with other machine with in the internal
> network through a machine (gateway). That gateway machine is
> called Server Correct me If I am wrong.
> But in advertisements, companies like IBM, HP are
> specifying that IBM Server, IBM Desktop PC. From the
> advertisements I have identified the difference between them
> is only Configuration (Normal PC will have 128MB RAM and
> Server machine will have 512MB RAM). Nothing much I have
> Identified. Also they are saying Servers will have RAID
> support. cant we do RAID (Software) in Normal machines? What
> is the difference between the Desktop PC and Server machine?
> Because as I stated inmy previous mails, I am going to
> configure mail,DNS, webservers in my machines. Do I need to
> buy the Server machine only or Can I configure all of them in
> normal machine (If I have good configuration like 512MB RAM,
> 80GB HDD, ..etc). Please let me know in detail about Server
> and normal PC.
>
>
> Thanks and rgds,
> Prasad Rao.
Any machine can be a server or a desktop (workstation) these days.
Typically though, server machines should be on server class hardware,
meaning that its more robust than a typical workstation. They often have
dual/redundant power supplies, SCSI drives in a RAID array (provided by
hardware, not software), more cooling fans, etc. This is so that even if
one component fails, the server will continue running. For critical
business use, you would want to use true server class hardware to run your
systems. For a home shop, you can use a regular pc if you want to. If
there is anything you don't want to lose though, you should make sure you do
regular backups and test them periodically. The only real requirements of a
machine is that it meets the requirements of the OS.
You can do raid in software, but it isn't generally a good idea. You can
though get a raid cards though even for your desktop with IDE.
-Mike
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:34:53 -0800
From: Rick Stevens <rstevens vitalstream com>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: sendmail and blocked dynamic IP addresses
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Chris Hewitt wrote:
> Even then it can go wrong. A large ISP here in the UK (not the one I'm
> with) decided that it would be a good anti-spam measure to no longer
> relay email from any domain that was not registered with them. (I'm told
> they also managed to not relay email for some domains that were). The
> stink when companies (their customers) suddenly found they could no
> longer send email was, well you can imagine.
That's called "whitelisting" and it is a friggin' nightmare. No one in
their right mind will sign up with such an ISP. It's a spectacularly
stupid idea.
>>> Is this what masquerading is for?
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, but all masquerading does is change the envelope sender to whatever
>> the masquerade is. To make your stuff go through, the envelope must be
>> "something verizon net". It won't appear to come from jaycrews.com.
>
>
> I've got a similar setup. All my computers here at home are on a private
> (not registered) domain and I masquerade (envelope and masquerade-all)
> as manordat.demon.co.uk so all email appears sent to and received from
> this. Although I do have a registered domain, I've not found a good way
> around this (without paying for a "business" account.
Yes, that's what masqueradig is for. The part that ticks people off is
that the sender is the masquerade domain, not the domain they want.
> I use my ISP's email server as my smart-host so all outgoing email goes
> via it. You can send email directly from your smtp server but some ISPs
> are now only accepting email from either other ISPs servers or you have
> to register your email server with them. I am told AOL is implementing
> this as an anti-spam measure.
AOL is truly living up to their acronym, "*ssholes On Line". Another
stupid whitelist trick.
> If you are e.g. something mycomputer verizon net then all email for that
> subdomain is under your own control, you define users as you want. The
> check, as Rick says, is that a DNS lookup for mycomputer.verizon.net
> results in an IP address that they control. I've defined users for my
> children and recently one for the Fedora list, just create the new unix
> user and it works.
Ah, so verizon lets you subdomain, eh? That's interesting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens vitalstream com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- "OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't TOUCH anything!" -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--__--__--
Message: 6
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:36:06 -0800
From: Rick Stevens <rstevens vitalstream com>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Printer maintenance
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
M.Schild wrote:
> According to someone on this list, I am an 'enlightened person' who
> chucked win98 for RH7.3.
> I don't regret it but how do I align the cartridges of my HP 690 inkjet
> printer?
> I seem to remember, using Win98, there was a program for that.Only used
> it once so I don't remember much about it. Is there an equivalent on 7.3?
The newer CUPS implementations have an alignment tool, so I'd recommend
upgrading to the latest CUPS. By default, 7.3 used lprng, not CUPS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens vitalstream com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- "Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes." -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:34:19 -0600
From: Justin Davis <jdavis15882 austin rr com>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
I have 2 SATA drives in RAID 0 configuration that my Windows XP is
installed on. I have installed another harddrive using the IDE port for
use with my Redhat Linux 9.0. When installing the Linux, the installer
detects the IDE drive fine, and partitions it with no problem. The
problem I have is that I want to use GRUB to dual boot the system, but
it doesn't detect the SATA RAID system at all. Right now, I have to
boot my Redhat using a boot disk. How do I have Grub see the SATA drive
in order to boot Windows?
Justin
--__--__--
Message: 8
Subject: Re: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht comcast net>
To: Redhat-Install-List <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:13:37 -0800
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 18:34, Justin Davis wrote:
> I have 2 SATA drives in RAID 0 configuration that my Windows XP is
> installed on. I have installed another harddrive using the IDE port for
> use with my Redhat Linux 9.0. When installing the Linux, the installer
> detects the IDE drive fine, and partitions it with no problem. The
> problem I have is that I want to use GRUB to dual boot the system, but
> it doesn't detect the SATA RAID system at all. Right now, I have to
> boot my Redhat using a boot disk. How do I have Grub see the SATA drive
> in order to boot Windows?
>
> Justin
If it's a Silicon Image SATA controller, then include the Silicon Image
driver in the kernel when you build the kernel. If it's an Intel chipset
there is probably a similar option when building the kernel.
I have no idea if RH includes these in their build, but I sort of
suspect that they do not.
Good luck,
Mark
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: "Justin Davis" <jdavis15882 austin rr com>
To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Subject: RE: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:20:02 -0600
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
I have a VIA SATA controller. I'm kind of new to linux and definitely not
knowledgeable about including things into the kernel, but even if the
drivers are in the kernel, will GRUB still be able to "see" the SATA drive?
I didn't think the kernel was loaded when GRUB is accessed to choose between
boot modes.
Justin
-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-install-list-admin redhat com
[mailto:redhat-install-list-admin redhat com] On Behalf Of Mark Knecht
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:14 PM
To: Redhat-Install-List
Subject: Re: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 18:34, Justin Davis wrote:
> I have 2 SATA drives in RAID 0 configuration that my Windows XP is
> installed on. I have installed another harddrive using the IDE port for
> use with my Redhat Linux 9.0. When installing the Linux, the installer
> detects the IDE drive fine, and partitions it with no problem. The
> problem I have is that I want to use GRUB to dual boot the system, but
> it doesn't detect the SATA RAID system at all. Right now, I have to
> boot my Redhat using a boot disk. How do I have Grub see the SATA drive
> in order to boot Windows?
>
> Justin
If it's a Silicon Image SATA controller, then include the Silicon Image
driver in the kernel when you build the kernel. If it's an Intel chipset
there is probably a similar option when building the kernel.
I have no idea if RH includes these in their build, but I sort of
suspect that they do not.
Good luck,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Redhat-install-list mailing list
Redhat-install-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
To Unsubscribe Go To ABOVE URL or send a message to:
redhat-install-list-request redhat com
Subject: unsubscribe
--__--__--
Message: 10
Subject: RE: new installation with IDE and SATA Raid
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht comcast net>
To: Redhat-Install-List <redhat-install-list redhat com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:36:26 -0800
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 20:20, Justin Davis wrote:
> I have a VIA SATA controller. I'm kind of new to linux and definitely not
> knowledgeable about including things into the kernel, but even if the
> drivers are in the kernel, will GRUB still be able to "see" the SATA drive?
> I didn't think the kernel was loaded when GRUB is accessed to choose between
> boot modes.
>
> Justin
>
Yeah, that stuff is pretty confusing. Grub should be able to 'see' the
drive *if* SATA support for your SATA controller is built into the
kernel. The SATA support has to be there so the kernel can control the
SATA controller.
On a machine I did for my dad last month I ended up with this in
grub.conf:
title=2.4.22-aa1
root (hd0,1)
kernel (hd0,1)/boot/bzImage-2.4.22-aa1 ro root=/dev/hde3 hdg=none
In this case I had a CDRW drive on '/dev/hda', but that's not counted as
a 'disk drive'. The SATA drive was /dev/hde, and since it was the first
drive it was HD(0). The boot partition was the second partition on the
drive, therefore HD(0,1). In this case there was a big time delay while
the Silicon Image SATA controller timed out on the second channel, so I
told it to ignore the second channel with the hdg-none part.
In your case, I'm guessing it will see your EIDE drive first and
probably want to boot from there as a BIOS operation. Normally I'd think
the boot partition needs to be on the first drive, and from there you
could transfer to the SATA drive to load the kernel. This is a guess on
my part though.
Now, for the difficult part...I do not remember seeing any support for
Via SATA controllers when I worked on this a month ago, but I wasn;t
looking, so I hope it's there and you can find it. However, it does need
to be built into the kernel or included in an initrd image if you want
to boot from it.
I hope this helps.
Best of luck,
Mark
--__--__--
Message: 11
Subject: Canon i560 printer driver ?
From: Frederic Durodie on GeminiX <frederic durodie wanadoo fr>
To: redhat-list redhat com, redhat-install-list redhat com
Organization: private
Date: 20 Dec 2003 12:12:07 +0100
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Hi,
can anyone tell me where I can find a printer driver for the Canon i560
printer (bubble jet phot quality printer, USB as well as lpt1 : I will
use the printer as connected to a winXP box).
If not can you tell me if there is a generic printer driver for such
printers.
Thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Frederic
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:24:29 +0000
From: Chris Hewitt <g0pae manordat demon co uk>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: sendmail and blocked dynamic IP addresses
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Rick Stevens wrote:
> Chris Hewitt wrote:
>
>> If you are e.g. something mycomputer verizon net then all email for
>> that subdomain is under your own control, you define users as you
>> want. The check, as Rick says, is that a DNS lookup for
>> mycomputer.verizon.net results in an IP address that they control.
>> I've defined users for my children and recently one for the Fedora
>> list, just create the new unix user and it works.
>
>
> Ah, so verizon lets you subdomain, eh? That's interesting.
I'm not saying that Verizon do, its an "if" there. My ISP is Demon
Internet and customers give their computer a name so that they become
mycomputername.demon.co.uk and that is in DNS (with static IP address).
Thus everything for my computer is under my own control (including
smtp server and my mistakes :-(
Regards
Chris
--__--__--
Message: 13
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:53:47 -0500
From: "M.Hockings" <veeshooter hockings net>
To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Subject: Re: re-directing root's email ?
Reply-To: redhat-install-list redhat com
Guy Rouillier wrote:
> Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:21:40PM -0500, M.Hockings wrote:
>>
>>> I notice that I see a bunch of different emails going to root on the
>>> house server. Since I don't often sign on as root is there an easy
>>> way to re-direct all of root's email to my real email address? Read
>>> "easy" as meaning something that someone (me) not too highly skilled
>>> in RH will be able to comprehend and do. ;-)
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>>
>>
>> Look in your aliases file (/etc/aliases for sendmail) near the
>> bottom. There is probably a commented out dummy alias for root.
>> Uncomment it and put the desired recipient address there. Then run
>>
>> newaliases
>>
>> I think you may also need to restart sendmail
>>
>> service sendmail restart
>>
>
> Bob, will a .forward file in root's directory accomplish the same thing?
>
>> Cheers,
>
I _amost_ have this working. Should be such a simple thing but it is
causing me a lot of grief. I am using the .forward file in root's home
dir to do the forward. Right now it is working on only one of three
machines. I _think_ I have them all configured identically. In fact I
have copied the /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file from the working machine to
the others and stop-make-start of sendmail but it still does not work.
Below is the mail log from the working machine and one non-working
machine. This is from a reboot and send an email to root sequence. I
use ximian to send the mail. Is there a better test, possibly a
command-line way? I see a difference in the last line, that additional
ctladdr parm in the failing case. Could that be causing the problem?
If so, how do I make it go away?
Working machine (swift)---------------
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sendmail[3165]: alias database /etc/aliases
rebuilt by root
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sendmail[3165]: /etc/aliases: 64 aliases, longest
23 bytes, 652 bytes total
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sendmail[3172]: starting daemon (8.12.10):
SMTP+queueing 01:00:00
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sm-msp-queue[3181]: starting daemon (8.12.10):
queueing 01:00:00
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sendmail[3183]: hBJNdDe3003183:
from=<root swift hockings net>, size=428, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<200312192337 hBJNbPxu009075 swift hockings net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=swift.hockings.net [127.0.0.1]
Dec 19 18:39:13 swift sm-msp-queue[3182]: hBJNbPxu009075: to=root,
ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:01:48, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=120132, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
(hBJNdDe3003183 Message accepted for delivery)
Dec 19 18:39:14 swift sendmail[3193]: hBJNdDe3003183:
to=swift root hockings net, ctladdr=<root swift hockings net> (0/0),
delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30655,
relay=mail.powergate.ca [216.183.11.6], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued
as 40D5F8753A)
Dec 19 18:39:20 swift spamd[3195]: server started on port 783/tcp
(running version 2.60)
Dec 20 00:02:57 swift sendmail[4274]: hBK52vNY004274:
from=mike hockings net, size=274, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<1071896576 4264 0 camel swift hockings net>, relay=root localhost
Dec 20 00:02:57 swift sendmail[4276]: hBK52ve3004276:
from=<mike hockings net>, size=434, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<1071896576 4264 0 camel swift hockings net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=swift.hockings.net [127.0.0.1]
Dec 20 00:02:57 swift sendmail[4274]: hBK52vNY004274: to=root,
ctladdr=mike hockings net (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00,
mailer=relay, pri=30274, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0,
stat=Sent (hBK52ve3004276 Message accepted for delivery)
Dec 20 00:02:58 swift sendmail[4277]: hBK52ve3004276:
to=swift root hockings net, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01,
mailer=relay, pri=30641, relay=mail.powergate.ca [216.183.11.6],
dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as DDFE087483)
Dec 20 00:06:03 swift sendmail[4361]: hBK563MH004361:
from=mike hockings net, size=276, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<1071896763 4355 0 camel swift hockings net>, relay=root localhost
Dec 20 00:06:03 swift sendmail[4363]: hBK563e3004363:
from=<mike hockings net>, size=436, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<1071896763 4355 0 camel swift hockings net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=swift.hockings.net [127.0.0.1]
Dec 20 00:06:03 swift sendmail[4361]: hBK563MH004361: to=root,
ctladdr=mike hockings net (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00,
mailer=relay, pri=30276, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0,
stat=Sent (hBK563e3004363 Message accepted for delivery)
Dec 20 00:06:04 swift sendmail[4364]: hBK563e3004363:
to=swift root hockings net, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01,
mailer=relay, pri=30643, relay=mail.powergate.ca [216.183.11.6],
dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued as 0C42287577)
Failing machine (james) ----------------------
Dec 19 16:53:47 james sendmail[2275]: alias database /etc/aliases
rebuilt by root
Dec 19 16:53:47 james sendmail[2275]: /etc/aliases: 63 aliases, longest
10 bytes, 625 bytes total
Dec 19 16:53:48 james sendmail[2282]: starting daemon (8.12.10):
SMTP+queueing 01:00:00
Dec 19 16:53:48 james sm-msp-queue[2291]: starting daemon (8.12.10):
queueing 01:00:00
Dec 20 00:29:52 james sendmail[2740]: hBK5Tpwi002740:
from=root james hockings net, size=350, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<200312200529 hBK5Tpwi002740 james hockings net>, relay=root localhost
Dec 20 00:29:52 james sendmail[2742]: hBK5Tqhd002742:
from=<root james hockings net>, size=601, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<200312200529 hBK5Tpwi002740 james hockings net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=james.hockings.net [127.0.0.1]
Dec 20 00:29:52 james sendmail[2740]: hBK5Tpwi002740: to=root,
ctladdr=root james hockings net (0/0), delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00,
mailer=relay, pri=30350, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0,
stat=Sent (hBK5Tqhd002742 Message accepted for delivery)
Dec 20 00:29:53 james sendmail[2743]: hBK5Tqhd002742:
to=james root hockings net, ctladdr=<root james hockings net> (0/0),
delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30823,
relay=mail.powergate.ca [216.183.11.6], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued
as 2F41F87579)
Dec 20 04:02:15 james sendmail[3114]: hBK92FcI003114: from=root,
size=12001, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<200312200902 hBK92FcI003114 james hockings net>, relay=root localhost
Dec 20 04:02:15 james sendmail[3117]: hBK92Fhd003117:
from=<root james hockings net>, size=12297, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<200312200902 hBK92FcI003114 james hockings net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=james.hockings.net [127.0.0.1]
Dec 20 04:02:15 james sendmail[3114]: hBK92FcI003114: to=root,
ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=42001, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
(hBK92Fhd003117 Message accepted for delivery)
Dec 20 04:02:16 james sendmail[3118]: hBK92Fhd003117:
to=james root hockings net, ctladdr=<root james hockings net> (0/0),
delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=relay, pri=42524,
relay=mail.powergate.ca [216.183.11.6], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok: queued
as DF25D8783F)
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
Redhat-install-list mailing list
Redhat-install-list redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-install-list
End of Redhat-install-list Digest
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.
Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]