[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Weird looking partition table
- From: "Mark Knecht" <mknecht controlnet com>
- To: <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: Weird looking partition table
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 07:29:38 -0700
>
> Op vr 30-05-2003, om 15:35 schreef Otto Haliburton:
> > Hda1 is a extended partition containing hda5, hda6, and hda7. I don't
> > know why it has Win95 in it except that partition type is loosely used
> > and may have stray bits in it(who knows). Looks okay to me, maybe
> > someone else has an opinion.
> >
>
> Thank you, "I can see clearly, now"
> So my Mandrake stuff is kept hostage by "Win95" :-)
> Maybe that's why it did not show up in GRUB?
>
Albert,
I think that it did not show up in grub because Mandrake and Redhat
install different grub installations. If you boot RH, but then mount either
hda5 or hda6 under RH, I think you will find another /boot directory and
another grub.conf file. This has happened to me in the past.
What you need to do is to 'consolidate' the grub.conf files from the two
installations into a single grub.conf under RH. Then grub will give you the
option to boot either one. As I say, I boot 3 different installations,
including RH and Mandrake, this way.
Mark
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]