[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Recommended Partitioning Scheme for a server.
- From: Bob McClure Jr <robertmcclure earthlink net>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Recommended Partitioning Scheme for a server.
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:15:05 -0600
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:42:11PM -0800, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Waldher, Travis R wrote:
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Rick Stevens [mailto:rstevens vitalstream com]
> >>Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:05 PM
> >>To: redhat-install-list redhat com
> >>Subject: Re: Recommended Partitioning Scheme for a server.
> >>
> << much, much snippage>>
> >>Waldher, Travis R wrote:
> >>>From: Rick Stevens [mailto:rstevens vitalstream com]
> >>You want separate partitions for a number of good reasons:
> >>
> >>1) If a filesystem craps out, you only have to restore the data for
> >>that specific filesystem, not the entire damned machine.
> >
> >
> >Agreed, Just in this case, the filesystem that keeps the machine running
> >is only about 3GB of real data. The actual users data is going to be on
> >15-30 different filesystems when deployed. To spread the risk of that
> >happening. For example:
> >
> >Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> >/dev/cciss/c0d0p2 6.7G 2.1G 4.3G 33% /
> >none 503M 0 503M 0% /dev/shm
> >/dev/cciss/c0d2p1 734G 3.3G 693G 1%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol01 52G 44G 6.2G 88% (mount points been deleted
> >for security reasons)
> >/dev/vg00/lvol02 43G 40G 1.3G 97%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol03 2.9G 1.9G 921M 68%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol04 45G 34G 10G 77%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol05 4.8G 3.4G 1.2G 73%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol06 960M 76M 836M 9%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol07 1.4G 1.1G 327M 77%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol08 1.9G 1.2G 669M 65%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol09 2.0G 1.6G 335M 83%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol10 387M 301M 67M 82%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol11 84G 75G 7.1G 92%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol12 42G 35G 6.1G 85%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol13 3.3G 2.2G 929M 71%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol14 2.9G 2.4G 390M 87%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol15 496M 33M 443M 7% /tmp
> >/dev/vg00/lvol16 6.8G 5.7G 796M 88%
> >/dev/vg00/lvol17 4.6G 2.9G 1.5G 66%
> >
> >(oh.. Don't mind the 734GB drive, it's not staying like that, it's only
> >that way to play around with it real quick.)
>
> Perfect. That's the way to do it. I assume you're using some form of
> hash to sort out who's directory goes where?
Umm, that's "... sort out _whose_ directory ..." "Who's" might be a
contraction for "who is", as in "Who's your ninth-grade English
teacher?" (The answer is, "I am." :-P)
Tag. You're it. ;-)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens vitalstream com -
> - VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
> - -
> - A day for firm decisions!!! Well, then again, maybe not! -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers,
--
Bob McClure, Jr. Bobcat Open Systems, Inc.
robertmcclure earthlink net http://www.bobcatos.com
If you can't see the bright side, polish the dull side.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]