[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FW: Drive Partitions
- From: Bob McClure Jr <robertmcclure earthlink net>
- To: redhat-install-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: FW: Drive Partitions
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:26:17 -0500
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:17:17PM -0400, Buck wrote:
>
> I guess that it is safe then to assume that whatever I would use,
> generally small networks to personal systems, 500MB would be sufficient
> for the /tmp partition. I have been seeing notes on the lists and in
> the books that partitions can be adjusted in size later.
Yes. Parted is the tool for that.
> A few more questions: is there an advantage of Reiser and Ext3 file
> systems over each other?
I don't know. I'll let others weigh in on that.
> I am setting up a computer now. I intend to partition it as a primary
> partition for /boot at 100MB, then an extended partition up to end of
> the drive leaving enough room for a swap partition.
>
> Should I leave enough room in the swap partition to accommodate the
> possibility of increasing RAM later, or is it best not to make it too
> large?
Allowing for more memory is a good idea.
> Are there any partitions that shouldn't be in the extended partition?
When using GRUB, no. I think LILO requires the filesystem containing
the kernel (usually /boot) to be a primary, not logical, partition.
> Thanks
> Buck
Cheers,
--
Bob McClure, Jr. Bobcat Open Systems, Inc.
robertmcclure earthlink net http://www.bobcatos.com
You may need to lose everything to find out that
God is all you need.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]