[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: procmailrc question
- From: Rick Stevens <rstevens vitalstream com>
- To: Getting started with Red Hat Linux <redhat-install-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: procmailrc question
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:19:09 -0800
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:41:27PM -0800, Waldher, Travis R wrote:
Ok.. good question here.
If I don't want an /etc/.procmailrc, and I have users that have an
invalid $HOME path on the sendmail server, how can I support .procmailrc
files for those users as procmail only appears to look at
$HOME/.procmailrc.
Not true. Procmail looks at /etc/procmailrc (not /etc/.procmailrc)
and then at $HOME/.procmailrc. Note also that the latter must be
owned by the user and be writable only by that user (644 perms).
True. One can also set up the "ForwardPath" option in the sendmail.cf
file to give a list of directories to search. For example, this line:
O ForwardPath=/usr/local/etc/forwards/$u.forward:$z/.forward
If the incoming mail was for user "fred", that line would cause the
system to first look for a "/usr/local/etc/forwards/fred.forward" file
If found, it is used. If not, it tries to find a ".forward" file in
fred's home directory. You can see that the system defaults to:
O ForwardPath=$z/.forward
"$z" is filled in with the user's home directory after sendmail does a
getpwent()-style call.
I'm curious. What users have an invalid $HOME, and why?
I second that question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens vitalstream com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- BASIC is the Computer Science version of `Scientific Creationism' -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]