Question about /tmp on OLD RH
Rick Stevens
rstevens at vitalstream.com
Mon Oct 3 18:05:52 UTC 2005
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 11:00 -0700, John Reynolds wrote:
> Hail, collective mind.
>
> We have a system running RedHat 7.2 (yes, you shake the case and stone
> arrowheads fall out). A user wants /tmp increased; it's current part of
> the root partition. You can't increase / without reconfiguring the
> system, which I am not about to do if it can be avoided. It would be an
> easy fix if /tmp could use swap space. I haven't been able to find out if
> this is possible or no. Since the system is about 500 miles away, I can't
> experiment; any change I make has to *work*.
>
> Does RH7.2 support tmpfs? What would the fstab entry look like? Is there
> an option I'm overlooking to solve the original problem of increasing
> /tmp?
Cheap and dirty? Find a big partition (say "/usr"). Then, reboot in
single user mode ("linux single" at the boot prompt). Once at the hash
prompt:
# mkdir /usr/newtmp
# cp -a /tmp/* /usr/newtmp
# rm -rf /tmp
# ln -s /usr/newtmp /tmp
What this does is create a new temp directory, "/usr/newtmp". You then
copy the contents of the existing /tmp into it, delete the old /tmp
directory and create a symbolic link to the new /usr/newtmp and give it
the old /tmp name.
This generally works. There may be occasions where this might not be
ideal--particularly where the system is trying to recover from a disk
corruption and /usr isn't mounted yet. However, for 95% of folk,
this'll work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- He who laughs last thinks slowest. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Redhat-install-list
mailing list