[no subject]

>Received: from unknown (HELO lists.redhat.com) (199.183.24.247)
>  by mail.iso-ne.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 1998 19:16:59 -0000
>Received: (qmail 17972 invoked by uid 501); 9 Dec 1998 19:03:20 -0000
>Date: 9 Dec 1998 19:03:19 -0000
>Message-ID: <19981209190319 17961 qmail lists redhat com>

I would assume that since the message id indicates qmail that they are
using qmail and ezmlm (Easy Mailing List Manager) for Redhat.

The main reason is that it is "secure" right out of the tarball.  You
have to explicitly allow relaying.

Matthew Soffen - Webmaster http://www.iso-ne.com/

ISO New England
1 Sullivan Road
Holyoke, MA 01040-2841
(413) 535 8167
==============================================
Boss    - "My boss says we need some eunuch programmers."
Dilbert - "I think he means UNIX and I already know UNIX."
Boss    - "Well, if the company nurse comes by, tell her I said 
             never mind."
                                       - Dilbert -
==============================================

> ----------
> From: 	Gordon Messmer[SMTP:yinyang eburg com]
> Sent: 	Wednesday, December 09, 1998 1:47 PM
> To: 	redhat-list redhat com
> Subject: 	Re: Email Spamming
> 
> sborho ststech com wrote:
> > 
> > On  9 Dec, trixer wrote:
> > > Check the headers of the email that was sent.  smtpd's that follow
> rfc's will
> > > always provide such headers.  We use Qmail here and its excellent
> for
> > > preventing spam and forged emails.  You can pick up qmail from
> > > http://www.qmail.org.
> > 
> > Ditto about qmail... although I had to beat it with a stick to make
> it
> > allow users I trusted to relay mail through it.  Darned Windows
> boxes
> > can't send e-mail themselves and need a Unix box to do all the work.
> > 
> 
> Really? I just added :
> 
> #Allow local users to send mail through qmail
> tcp-env: 192.168.1., 127. : setenv = RELAYCLIENT
> #And allow the rest of the internet to send mail to us.
> tcp-env: ALL
> 
> to the /etc/hosts.allow file  :)
> 
> Is there a reason that RedHat uses sendmail rather than qmail?  Or is
> it just "the standard"?  Perhaps no one has expressed any demand for
> the software...
> 
> It seems like qmail's site, when discussing qmail's 'fast+queued'
> mode, made the claim that redhat's lists are run on qmail.  Can any
> RedHat'ers confirm or deny this?
> 
> MSG
>