[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Ping return for down hosts



On 10/31/98, at 3:34 AM, Thomas Gaume wrote: 

>OK, how about another approach?
>
>How about a script that is simular to what you would do if you were
setting up
>a backup server.  Machine B checks the status of machine A, if it don't
answer
>have the script running on machine B add the IP address of the ethernet
card
>of machine A, if A starts responding remove the IP address.  Obviously
there
>lies a problem in the amount of time both cards would be active on the
same
>IP.  But I think this could be avoided by having the checking taking place
on
>private (192.168.x.x) addresses.

Hehe, I hate to tell you but you just sent 2 replies direct to me instead
of the mail list :-)

I am no programmer so can't really help, but what about redirecting all
ping requests only to a PC with duplicate IPs?  All other traffic would
still go to the real IPs.

Or, block pings totally as a "security measure".  Try pinging
ftp.redhat.com or even microsoft.com and you don't get a reply at all, so
if they can get away with it...

We were recently subject to a smurf attack, thats a pretty good reason to
block pings in my opinion.






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]