Re: router performance benchmark

["Aaron D. Turner" <aturner best com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Check the Linux Router Project page:
http://www.psychosis.com/linux-router/

- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner pobox com      | Check out the RedHat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Sat, 5 Sep 1998 vbajaj portal stwing upenn edu wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I now have the unenviable task of implementing a VPN for a client
> using Linux routers, with VPN<--> internet
> controlled/filtered/proxied.  All trivial to do, and I've done it
> before, just with slower leased lines or with dedicated hardware
> (e.g. Cisco IP GRE) on faster networks.  
> 
> The trouble is that I can't find any hardware benchmarks, obviously,
> so I thought that one of you might have done this before.  What is the
> sort of latency, process bandwidth etc. can I expect with midrange
> Pentium machines, a VPN across five subnets (with about 5 machines per
> subnet), connected locally by switch?
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNfNlOjM3jpXy1kJtAQFZDAP+LXynXiNo7qU1T+B9ySalFozwfNLpVLMh
bNjyLtqfl9M03rvEdKlv10k6lPPf4hJ4r0t9MfBu/R+HHtttLoRyf0jY+la0OAvb
tCKJfGaqu0O5NSMDMmOoY+IR3RAqrQnu0mSQUJKpMMX2npeaRuVj+KJm3DtZ75DD
8E0jIFO8jCU=
=Wk+D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----