[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: <OT> Latest Mindcraft Linux bashing
- From: Alan Mead <adm ipat com>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: <OT> Latest Mindcraft Linux bashing
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:49:12 -0500
At 08:30 AM 4/15/99 -0400, you wrote:
>RedHat: we need a non-biased rebuttal, with a detailed comparison and
>analysis of the report. If there are technical issues, the Linux
>community
>needs to address them, and soon.
Wade, rebuttals are popping up all over, maybe someone reading this has
compiled a list. I think I probably speak for most people on the list when
I say I personally am sure the report it is a sham. Since there are
previous inconsistent tests published, I think education might be more
effective than more research. There are a lot more Linux users than there
are MS-paid axemen.
And a personal venting: The more I think about this sad action the madder
I get. As one who calls himself a scientist, I am outraged that such shit
is being passed off as research. It's like "crying wolf!"--each instance
makes people jaded to the results of the work that I do.
---
Alan D. Mead / Research Scientist / adm ipat com
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
1801 Woodfield Dr / Savoy IL 61874 USA
217-352-4739 (v) / 217-352-9674 (f)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]