[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: bash questions (while we're at it...)
- From: "David" <dtalk soltec net>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: RE: bash questions (while we're at it...)
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 14:29:47 -0500
I see. Did you ever figure out which script and what its gripe was? I
don't know of any feature or support that was dropped for 2.x. I have had
no problems, so perhaps the issue was resolved since you tried it.
Thanks for the info -d
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gordon mail redhat com [mailto:gordon mail redhat com]On Behalf Of
> Gordon Messmer
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 1:08 PM
> To: redhat-list redhat com
> Subject: Re: bash questions (while we're at it...)
>
>
> David wrote:
> >
> > I upgraded to bash 2.03 for experimentation; it compiles and
> installs fine,
> > seems to run without a hitch. Anybody know why RH 6.0 ships
> with such an
> > old version (reports 1.14.7)? Just not enough hours in a day, maybe?
>
> A couple of years ago, when I was using slack, I upgraded (read:
> replaced) my bash 1.something with bash 2.00. This, unfortunately,
> broke my init-scripts. I didn't figure that out the first time,
> actually. I reinstalled, ran for a week or so and did it again. That
> time I figured it out :) I don't know where bash 2 is at now, but it
> may not be 100% ready yet (despite it's version number).
>
> MSG
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail redhat-list-request redhat com with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]