[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: xntpd question
- From: Aaron Turner <aturner linuxkb org>
- To: RedHat List <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: xntpd question
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Looks like port 123 which is for ntp is already in use. use netstat or
lsof to find the process which has the port locked. My guess is that
xntpd is already running though, which explains the error in your log file
and why is shows connected.
ps auxww | grep xntpd
to see if it's running already.
--
Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/
Linux Knowledge Base Organization http://linuxkb.org/
Because world domination requires quality open documentation.
aka: aturner vicinity com, aturner pobox com, ion_beam_head ashtech net
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
>
> > Dec 20 21:13:17 cyrix xntpd[25555]: bind() fd 10, family 2, port 123, addr
> > e0000101, in_classd=1 flags=0 fails: Address already in use
>
> In partial answer to my own question, ntpq -p reports that the daemon is
> in fact reaching the designated servers. This only deepens the mystery
> about "address already in use."
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]