[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "linux single" security problem
- From: Eddie Kuns <ekuns kilroy chi il us>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: "linux single" security problem
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 11:13:29 -0600
bkosse iname com said:
] It's no less secure. Unix password encryption is dreadfully stupid.
] Give cracklib about 2 days tops to break damn near any password.
So tell PAM to use md5 checksums instead of the usual password mechanism.
It's a stronger encryption (I think) and allows longer passwords.
Eddie
P.S. On cleartext passwords in lilo.conf -- hopefully one would never use
a root password or other password as the lilo password! As long as the
lilo password is not used elsewhere, you're certainly no less secure and
arguably much more secure than you are without one. (As long as lilo.conf
is mode 600)
--
Eddie Kuns | School: ekuns rci rutgers edu Home: ekuns kilroy chi il us
--------------/ URL: http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~ekuns/
"Ah, savory cheese puffs, made inedible by time and fate." -- The Tick
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]