[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Hedwig List, Apache Compile (was Re: Response to Mr. Steve Colie)
- From: Rick Forrester <rickf glacier jpl nasa gov>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Cc: hedwig-list redhat com, "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw wittsend com>
- Subject: Re: Hedwig List, Apache Compile (was Re: Response to Mr. Steve Colie)
- Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:21:16 -0700
mhw wittsend com said:
> I tried to subscribe when I discovered that the apache source rpm
> from 6.0 won't even compile on 6.0. Yes I applied all the RedHat
> patches and even figured out the screwy configure command "./
> configure --with-layout=RedHat --enable-module=all
> --enable-shared=max" to get it to match the installation. (It would
> be nice if convoluted configure commands are required for a package
> that those commands would be documented somewhere).
> First it gives me compile errors like this:
> mod_auth_dbm.c:77: ndbm.h: No such file or directory make[4]: ***
> [mod_auth_dbm.so] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> [subdirs] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/apache_1.3.6/
> src' make[1]: *** [build-std] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/
> usr/src/apache_1.3.6' make: *** [build] Error 2
> Then (after working my way around that one) I can't get half of the
> modules to load because of an undefined symbol "stat".
> I'm begining to think that there have been too many changes made in
> the RedHat way of tinkering with locations. Now the source packages
> are not even consistant with the distributed binaries. That means, I
> go back to 5.2 or find another distribution. This may be acceptable
> for people who only want to ever install from binary rpms and never
> recompile something for themselves (I really don't want the DSOs in
> Apache and I've got to compile some other stuff in) but it is not
> acceptable to people like me who do have to add things back in on
> top.
Mike, I'll start a test run on the 6.0 source rpms this evening when I
get home. I was one of the beta testers, and as one test, precisely
because of this sort of thing, I ran a build test on the source RPM's
which were in the 5.9.7 beta. The beta & QA people at Red Hat are
concerned about this sort of thing; they burned a special set of cdroms,
source and binary, just so I could do this easily. There are always
changes in the move to the final release, though, and a problem probably
crept in at that point.
I'll let you know what happens.
best
rickf
--
Rick Forrister <Richard Forrister jpl nasa gov>
"To get something done a committee should consist of no more than
three people, two of whom are absent." Robert Copeland
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]