[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPM doesn't do as it is told.
- From: "Igmar Palsenberg" <palsenberg tebenet nl>
- To: <redhat-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RPM doesn't do as it is told.
- Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 09:24:59 +0200
>I know that Redhat is real proud of the RPM system that it has. But >it
causes
>me no end of grief when trying to do updates of packages.
>Prime example. On the Redhat website they discusses a new >Netscape RPM
that
>should be installed because of a security fix. They give "rpm -Uvh >file"
>as the instruction for each of the three Netscape packages. Guess >what
Redhat,
>it don't f**king work. Witness:
>rpm -Uvh netscape-common-4.6-1.i386.rpm
>error: failed dependencies:
> netscape-common = 4.51 is needed by netscape->communicator-4.51-3
>So, I do:
>rpm -Uvh --force netscape-common-4.6-1.i386.rpm
>error: failed dependencies:
> netscape-common = 4.51 is needed by netscape->communicator-4.51-3
>What good is rpm if it doesn't do what you want? These catch-22
>situations
>have always given me trouble. Did anyone at Redhat even try their >own
>instructions on a fresh 6.0 install? It seems not, otherwise it would
>have
>given the same error as I got.
>I even tried:
>rpm -Uvh --force netscape-communicator-4.6-1.i386.rpm
>error: failed dependencies:
> netscape-common = 4.6 is needed by netscape->communicator-4.6-1
You can't force an upgrade. In this case, Netscape-common and the other
thingy depend on each other, wich means that you must use --nodeps on one of
those.
rpm -Uvh --nodeps netscape-common<version>.rpm
>So, just how is someone supposed to install these new Netscape >rpms? Most
>importantly, when is rpm going to be fixed so that --force really >does
force
>the update?
>MB
Igmar
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]