[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Security implications ?
- From: Steve Frampton <frampton j-com co jp>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: Security implications ?
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:14:58 +0900 (JST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Mike Lewis wrote:
> Aren't you saying that you have no confidence in your firewall, and all
> those updates you installed from RH ?
You've got a decent firewall set up (hopefully with Linux, right? What
kind of moron would spent $18,000 on Firewall-1 when Linux can do the same
thing?), applied all your updates, and don't have local shell
users? Okay, chmod a+r the log files then. :-)
- --------------< LINUX: The choice of a GNU generation. >--------------
Steve Frampton <frampton j-com co jp> Japan Communications, Inc.
Software Developer/Systems Administrator http://www.j-com.co.jp/
GNU Privacy Guard ID: D055EBC5 (see http://www.gnupg.org for details)
GNU-PG Fingerprint: EEFB F03D 29B6 07E8 AF73 EF6A 9A72 F1F5 D055 EBC5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE4lTZ1mnLx9dBV68URAi6QAJ4/mrEj5p1E2otDNU8jHIUy8uwqYgCfZV/s
mq9vcrAN6lHUZ5vsLlHuflU=
=Xaep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]