[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: xfs question re Hal Burgiss xfs site
- From: Hal Burgiss <hburgiss bellsouth net>
- To: redhat-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: xfs question re Hal Burgiss xfs site
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:22:26 -0400
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 08:53:38PM -0700, Jack Byers wrote:
>
> This 3-pid pattern seems to continuously being updated, really odd:
> [byers byers byers]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
> xfs (pid 14929
> 14932
> 14934) is running...
> [byers byers byers]$
> [byers byers byers]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
> xfs (pid 14936
> 14939
> 14941) is running...
> [byers byers byers]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
> xfs (pid 14943
> 14946
> 14948) is running...
> [byers byers byers]$
>
>
> I guess your idea that the init script is fubar is likely
Seems so, or /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions ... This is 6.2:
[hal feenix hal]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
xfs (pid 7172) is running...
[hal feenix hal]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
xfs (pid 7172) is running...
[hal feenix hal]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
xfs (pid 7172) is running...
[hal feenix hal]$ /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs status
xfs (pid 7172) is running...
[hal feenix hal]$ ps aux | grep xfs
xfs 7172 0.0 2.4 5736 3136 ? S May29 1:17 xfs -droppriv -da
Still, if this is 5.2 xfs, I don't think you will get TrueType working
anyway via stock xfs, assuming this is the objective. Or, has this
been incorporated as part of an update?
--
Hal B
hburgiss bellsouth net
--
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]