[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RPMs - Frustration sets in.
- From: Charles Galpin <cgalpin lighthouse-software com>
- To: lloy0076 <lloy0076 rebel net au>
- Cc: redhat-list redhat com, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: RPMs - Frustration sets in.
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 12:01:25 -0500 (EST)
mmh. Then answer me this. If you don't find rpm useful, what attracts you
to Red Hat? I think rpm is what distinguishes it. You might as well use
slackware if you don't care for rpm.
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, lloy0076 wrote:
>
> HEHEHE
>
> I avoid use RPM as much as I can. If I ever use it I always use --force.
> The RPM database seems to fall over even worse then the Windows Registry
> if I may say so myself. It's good for a system where ALL YOU EVER
> install is RPM'ed, and it's on high reliability but other than that it's
> caused me far too much grief to be bothered.
>
> I don't try to pretend that Linux is Windows and just use make and
> ./configure.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]